Displaying items by tag: Peter Malone's Movie Reviews

THE PRESIDENT’S WIFE/ BERNADETTE

France, 2023, 93 minutes, Colour.

Catherine Deneuve, Denis Podalydes, Michel Vuillermoz, Sarah Giraudeau, Laurent Stocker, Maud Wyler.

Directed by Lea Domenach.

A comedy with serious political undertones. And the question is: do audiences outside France know enough about the presidency of Jacques Chirac in the 1990s and early 2000s, aware of the career of his wife, Bernadette, and her influence. It will be very interesting to read the reviews to gauge how much is fact, how much is exaggeration, how much is comedy, how much is serious.

And, of course, to find out whether French audiences like the film or not, depending on their particular political perspectives, in the reassessing of Chirac’s presidency, the influence of the far right and Le Penne 20 years ago, the similarities with the pre-Olympics 2024 elections, the ins and outs of French politics.

The opening of the film is something of an eye and ear delight, a mixed choir, in robes, chanting with polyphony, initial information about who Bernadette was, her family lineage, her political career, her marriage to the future president, her determination, the place of women in French politics in the 19^th century, and her husband’s infidelities.

And who better to portray Bernadette Chirac than the doyen of French actresses, Catherine Deneuve, the film released as she turned 80, remembering her rather brilliant career, headlining film credits for 60 years. And, at various stages, she was the image symbol of France, Marianne.

Catherine Deneuve gives a commanding performance as Bernadette even though so often she is at the command, the phone beck and call of her ambitious husband. She has had something of a local political career, her husband is a political male chauvinist, becoming increasingly alarmed at her upfront presence in his campaigns, in her social work, establishing a hospital, television appearances, music and sports stars eager to support her charities.

It needs to be said that the portrait of Jacques Chirac in this film is exceedingly one-dimensional, preoccupied with power, upset at his wife’s increasing public presence, something of the moving equivalent of newspaper cartoons. And, in many ways, that is how his supporters are presented – the exception being Nicholas Sarkozy and his moves against Chirac but who was in line to succeed him.

One of the very interesting characters, but also one-dimensional, is the Chirac’s daughter, Claude, 110% committed to her father’s political career, rather humourless, single-minded, critical of her mother and also trying to control her, but the suggestion that she have a mentor. He is played by Dennis Podylades, the other multi-dimensional character in the film, a touch pedantic, politically shrewd, public relations savvy, becoming a good friend and supporter of Bernadette.

The film is comparatively brief, indicates the timeline with continued jumps of several years from 1995 to the mid-2000’s.

Whether an audience outside France would be eager to see the film is a question. The obvious attraction is Catherine Deneuve. It may well be interesting to make political comparisons with campaigns of other countries (it is the era of Clinton at first, with a visit from Hillary Clinton to France – but there is no mention of George Bush.)

Entertaining in its way but comparatively slight.

1. For a French audience? For those outside France? Knowledge of Jacques Chirac? Of Bernadette?
2. The settings, Paris, the political world, society world, campaigns, hospital promotion, of the family, political work behind the scenes? The musical score?
3. Catherine Deneuve, her status, portraying a public figure, age, appearance, fashion and style?
4. The actual story of Jacques Chirac and his wife, the long marriage, his character, single-minded, philandering, dominating his wife, phone calls, expectations, his resenting her being in the limelight, pushing her out of view, her success, his harsh reactions, politicking, her role in the campaigns? His election, his staff, his reliance on Claude managing his business, the resentments against Sarkozy, barracking at the football match, phoning his wife, intervening, his stroke, his retirement?
5. Bernadette, local politics, her involvement, popularity, her reaction to her husband, expectations, his affairs, her patience, expressing her views, Claude’s reaction, advising the mentor, Bernadette response, collaborating with him, the hospital, the entertainment and sports stars, publicity, meetings, events? Her relationship with Laurence, her illness, her concern, passed over by her husband, gradually emerging, her support of Sarkozy after meeting with him, given her former resentments?
6. The mentor, character, task, responding well to Bernadette, their collaboration, improving her style, appearance, public functions, charities, achievement?
7. Her daughters, Claude and her strictness, devoted to her father, referring to him as the president? Is one, her past illness, her concern, her daughter’s resentment and reactions?
8. The politicos, their characters, yes-men to Iraq, and vice, situations, elections and campaigns, the far right and its success? Supporting Sarkozy?
9. Political comment, the light touch, comic, satiric?

OPERATION NAPOLEON

Iceland, 2023, 104 minutes, Colour.

Vivian Olafsdottor, Jack Fox, Iain Glenn, Wotan Wilke Morhing, Olafur Darri Olafsson, Atli Oskar Fjalarsson, Adesuwa Oni, Annette Badland .

Directed by Oskar Thor Axelsson.

This is something of an old-fashioned action adventure – very popular in the latter part of the 20^th century, big budget, fantastic plots from the past.

And, it is a film from Iceland. The focus is on an enterprising young woman, competitive in her field, concerned about her brother. He is out on an expedition in the snowfields and discovers a crashed plane, almost immediately confronted by a tough commando group, and killing, his being taken. His sister and an associate to the rescue.

The back story is a Nazi tale, a plane, gold, Hitler’s plans, possible escape, a crash and disappearance.

The villain of the piece is the CIA official, played by Iain Glenn. He has been searching for the crashed plane and its contents, continual surveillance over the decades, now taking advantage of the opportunity to recover the plane and its contents.

Some interesting characters out there in the snowfields, a big giant of a man who collaborates with the searchers, an elderly woman who has records from her researches of the past.

More or less as might be expected of this kind of adventure but enjoyable in its own way.

1. Action adventure in Iceland? From an action novel? Old style action?
2. The title, the background of the Nazis, some newsreel footage, plots, Hitler, gold?
3. The Iceland scenery, its impact?
4. Kristin, her personality, career, critical of collaborators? Her brother, the flashbacks, the bond? The interruption to her argument, his contact?
5. Alliance, the expedition, companions, out in the ice, their discoveries?
6. The encounter with Julie rat off, her squad, her pencil, ruthlessness? Her mission? The confrontations with Kristin?
7. Car, the CIA, the family man with the grandchildren, his power, the mission, the flight, Julie and the squad, the discoveries, the challenge, his arrival, revelations about him, the search, the secrecy, the operation, the name of Napoleon, his son, the encounter with Are in the past, with Sarah? The buildup to the confrontations, the stand-off, shooting, deaths?
8. Simon, the killer, stalking Kristin, the attempts to kill her, Steve?
9. Kristin Steve, his background, interests, their working together, her being tough, his difficulties? The visit to Owner, to Sarah, the discovery of what it happened? Action together?
10. I now, his character, the loner, trusting Kristin, the explanations, the background, his final interventions?
11. The clues for Sarah, visiting her, her investigations, her life, age, the confrontations?
12. The climax in the snow, good prevailing, the villain is being defeated?

L'ETE DERNIERE/ LAST SUMMER

France, 2023, 104 minutes, Colour.

Lea Drucker, Samuel Kircher, Olivier Rabourdin, Clotilde Courau.

Directed by Catherine Breillat.

The title sounds innocent enough, rather languid in memory. However, this is a film adapted from a novel, written and directed by veteran French director, Catherine Breillat. Over the decades, she has ventured cinematic probes on all kinds of intense personal issues, relationships, sexuality. This is her first film in a decade, taking up an important theme, a relationship between an older woman and a younger man, and this time the younger man is underage.

This issue has been prominent in films in 2023-2024. There was May-December, based on an actual case in the United States. There was the light romantic comedy, A Family Affair, with Nicole Kidman and Zac Efron. There was also the romantic comedy with some serious overtones, especially public targeting of the older woman, The Idea of You, with Anne Hathaway and Nicholas Gallantzine. And, at the same time, there was also a film, Miller’s Girl, with Martin Freeman and Jenna Ortega, taking up relationships between male academics and younger female students.

The film opens strongly with the theme of legal defence for victims of sexual attacks. The central character, Anne (Lea Drucker), strongly professional, intelligent, working with a young survivor for her court appearance, successful in prosecution. She has married an older husband, Pierre, adopted two young girls, her husband having problems with his teenage son, Theo (Samuel Kircher) from his previous marriage.

The drama and the issues begin when Theo moves out from his mother and becomes part of Anne and Pierre's household, surly, on his phone, as always, cantankerous with his father, but delighting in playing with the two little girls who love him. And Theo has a girlfriend who turns up.

Gradually, somewhat surprisingly given Anne’s professional standards, there is an attraction, Theo making advances from his immature perspective, wanting some support and love, Anne succumbing.

Catherine Breillat has always had a very direct, open and frank approach to dramatising this kind of situation. And this is the case here. And, she employs a very forceful cinematic style of photography, the continued use of close-ups, of extreme close-ups of the faces of her protagonists, long takes, letting the audience watch, respond, gauge their reactions, favourable, unfavourable. The affair continues, sometimes lyrical, sometimes passionate. It might seem that we are being invited to favour the relationship.

But, that is the skill of the film. There is the ethical and moral challenge to Anne and her beliefs, legal practice. And the word that some commentators have used about her behaviour is “transgression”. Knowing the ethics, she has allowed herself to be overcome by lustful feelings, compensations, exploitation of the inexperience of the willing teenager.

Which means, that at the end of the film, you six has had to face the reality of her actions, face the consequences, appreciate the impact of the experience on Theo. And, there is a drama of Theo and his reaction, his accusations against Anne, the complexities of his emotions in loving and hating her.

Last Summer is challenging for its protagonists but also offers an emotional and moral challenge to the audience.

1. The title, the season, memories, languid?
2. The work of the director, themes of relationships, sexuality, conflicts?
3. The style of the camera work and its impact for understanding characters, situations, dilemmas? The very long takes, the extreme close-ups of faces and heads? Involving the audience in the personalities, their emotions, choices, decisions?
4. The focus on And, her work, the law, abused children, the first client and the discussions, priming her for the court case, the results, her mother, Anne stopping interviews, personality, her manner, style, clothes? Coming home, the relationship with Pierre, his second marriage, his age and job, her love for him, the adoption of the two children, her explanation about the early abortion and inability to have children, her concern about Theo? The life, happy in her work?
5. Pierre, his age, divorce, remarrying, the adopting of the two children, the happy domestic sequences, his concern about Theo, Theo living with his mother, adolescent, in trouble, inviting him to come to live with them?
6. The background of the two little girls, their backgrounds, adopted, happy, adversity, the martial arts and Theo, playing with him, the trampoline, his being at home with them, their devotion to him?
7. Theo, his age, the background, police, trouble, living with his mother, coming to stay in the family, the tension with his father, smoking, the phone, defying his father, his father’s outbursts? Suspicion of An?
8. Audiences sensing what was going to happen? The discussion about the tattoos, And her resistance, Theo’s explanations, trying to persuade and, putting the three dots on her arm, the intimacy of the touch? The moment of Theo with his girlfriend, Amanda? The sense of anticipation, wondering, the scenes of An and Theo together, talking, the scooter, the nature of the conversations? The attraction? Passion, lust? The kiss, and at her resistance, the passionate experience, the long time, the focus on faces, the aftermath?
9. The comparison with An and her intimacy with Pierre, the long sequence, again the focus on faces? The aftermath?
10. And, her relationship with a sister, the beauty salon, with a little girls, her son, coming to the parties? Playing on the trampoline?
11. The affair, the further episodes, the effect on each of them? And, the party, Theo and his approach, her sister seeing them? And in the decision to break off, the effect on Theo?
12. Pierre, the decision to go away with Theo, his return, the meal, tension, peer telling And what Theo told her him? And is decision to deny?
13. The change in and, the denial, her lawyer mode, attacking Theo and his credibility, challenging Pierre and his trust? Her decision to move out?
14. Pierre, setting up the confrontation, And her hard stances, Theo and the confused adolescent, his experiences, determination, being taken to the other school, the farewell to the girls?
15. The lawyer, Theo and his complaint, the lawyers attitude towards Anne, her professionalism, the deal, the secrecy?
16. The seeming piece, her sister and her support? Theo’s arrival, the next encounter, the issue of consent, transcription, the older woman, the law and morality concerning sexual encounters with an underage partner? And her risking her life and career, her family?
17. The ending, open, the sister supporting her, the relationship with Theo and his future, and the glimpse of Pierre and his seeming to accept what had happened?

THE EXORCISM

US, 2024, 93 minutes, Colour.

Russell Crowe, Ryan Simpkins, Sam Worthington, Chloe Bailey, Adam Goldberg, David Hyde Pierce, Adrian Pasdar, Samantha Mathis.

Directed by Joshua John Miller.

The Exorcism was released in 2024 although information is at hand that it was filmed at the end of 2019. Russell Crowe appeared as the Vatican exorcist in 2023, The Pope’s Exorcist. This seems to have offered an opportunity for The Exorcism to be released.

Interestingly, the film has been cowritten and directed by Joshua John Miller. He is the son of the actor, Jason Miller, who played Father Karars in The Exorcist – although Joshua John Miller was born the year after the film’s release but he may have been drawing on family discussions in the ensuing years about the film and its effect on his father.

The film opens eerily with an actor walking through the various storeys of the set, rehearsing his lines, then suddenly attacked and killed. Which means that there needs to be re-casting.

This is a film about the making of the film with some scenes of the film within the film. There is an elaborate set, the multi-storyed and a basement, the basement used, of course, for a dramatic climax. On the whole, the film is, literally, very dark. The apartment of the actor is full of shadows, sometimes sinister. Most of the action takes place on the set with some interior darkness. While there are some moments outside the apartment and the studio, they are generally night scenes, also dark.

And, the theme of the film is dark. Russell Crowe plays an actor, a back story of alcoholism and addiction, neglected wife and daughter, to rehab, being offered the role of the exorcist priest in the new film – which has links to the original, the screenplay in the film called The Georgetown Project. The name of the actor is Tony Miller – same surname as the director.

Tony Miller is diffident, is interviewed, does readings, gets the role, ups and downs in performance, some reconciliation with his daughter (Ryan Simpkins), suspended from school, attracted to the young actress who is playing the possessed victim in the film (Chloe Bailey). Things begin to go more wrong, the actor becoming more and more possessed, building up to an exorcism confrontation, especially with the priest adviser to the film, an unexpected appearance by David Hyde Pierce.

Final dramatics and melodramatics of exorcism. Compared with of the Exorcism films, this one seems rather slight in its imagination, not an essential exorcism film at all, but it must be said that Russell Crowe certainly gives his serious best in his performance.

1. Continued audience interest in films of exorcisms? The references here to the original Exorcist? The Georgetown Project? And the writer-director, son of Jason Miller, Father Karas?
2. A film about the making of the film and the film within the film?
3. The opening, the priest, rehearsing his lines, going through the set, the eerie experience, his death?
4. The focus on Tony Miller the introduction, his back story, Catholic, altar boy, abuse and the flashbacks to the sequences, alcohol, the death of his wife, neglect of his daughter? Rehab? Only going to the confessional, after 40 years, the return to the confessional? The offer of a comeback? Diffidence? Preparing the lines, his daughter returning, her suspension, his reactions? Rehearsing his lines with her? Encouraged by her? Making her his PA?
5. The director, his background, intentions, the choice of Tony, the discussions, the readings, interviews? The decision for Tony to act in the film?
6. The darkness of the film, even in the brief outdoor sequences, at night? The apartment dark? The set, the house with its several storeys? The musical score?
7. The signalling of the days of shooting? Tony, the scenes, his renditions, the director and his advice, dissatisfaction? The effect on Tony and his performance? At home? The temptation to drink? His finally succumbing?
8. The actress, Blake, the role of the possessed woman? Friendship with Lee, sharing, the sexual encounter?
9. Tony and his gradual deterioration, his becoming possessed? Not himself, the threats to others, confrontations, with Lee, her desperation?
10. Father Conor, expert advice, Tony asking about why he became a priest, his heroes? His study of psychology? The discussions with the Lee, the confrontations with Tony?
11. The desperation of the film crew? The pressure to get the film made?
12. The buildup to the climax, the basement in the set, the eerie atmosphere, Lee going down, Fr Conor offering himself? The behaviour of the possessed Tony, the priest and Blake, paralysed? Lee and the confrontation? Prayers, the litany of the saints, Tony recovering, Fr Conor and his being overcome, destroyed?
13. The culmination of the experience, this film as an exorcist and possession film, and the speculations about the effect of such a theme on the cast and crew?

THE KILL ROOM

US, 2023, 98 minutes, Colour.

Uma Thurman, Joe Manganiello, Samuel L.Jackson, Amy Keum, Maya Hawke, Dree Hemingway, Jennifer Kim, Larry Pine, Candy Buckley, Tom Pecinka, Nikolai Tsankhov.

Directed by Nicol Paone.

As the title for a film about competitiveness in the art world, The Kill Room doesn’t seem quite likely.

In fact, the film does open with a murder, a seemingly charming man walking along the street, Joe Manganiello, reacts to an insult and kill someone. It emerges that he is a hitman, completely amoral, but with potential charm. Samuel L.Jackson plays a shady character, involved in the food industry, but with links to organised crime.

The other strand of the film focuses on Patrice, Uma Thurman, director of a Gallery, caught up in high society, but in financial needs. Then comes the strange linking of the two worlds.

The proposal is that the hitman attempt some paintings – but, surprisingly, is successful. The scheme for his paintings is money laundering with the paintings sold but staying in the Gallery. However, Patrice’s enthusiastic assistant, is keen to promote them. Consequently, the hitman becomes a celebrated artist, called The Bagman, with exhibitions and sales.

So, this is a satirical comedy, critique of cut throat action in the art world, paralleling it with the world of organised crime and hits.

The comparison would be Velvet Buzzsaw which had a star cast also critical of cut throat action in the art world.

1. The title? The finale and the storage of empty cases?
2. The satiric perspective of the film? Serious themes? The hitman, dealing, money laundering, the bosses? The contrast with the art world? Bringing them together?
3. The city settings, the bars, the Jewish bagel shop, the art gallery, streets and buildings, but exhibitions, the studio for The Big man? Atmosphere? Musical score?
4. Introduction to Reggie, of the incident, the killing? The continued hits? The later background to Reggie’s life, his sister, trouble, her addiction, his helping her out, the murders? The gang bosses? The relationship with Gordon? Is to do the paintings, seeing him at work, his reaction to be an artist, introduction to the art world?
5. Patrice, her gallery, her drug habit, financial difficulties, the story of her cutting off a famous artist, her motivations? Leslie as her internal? Discussions with Greece, the paintings, grease and her anger? The various rivals, Fern, Annika, the power of The Kimono and her articles? Different clientele? The exhibition, no sales, her later explaining to Reggie Greece’s childhood and her paintings? Her financial difficulties?
6. Her drug habit, connections with Note, discussion about the paintings, note having a painting, Gordon seeing it, the idea for laundering money through art? His visit to Greece, their interactions, her refusal? Growing financial difficulties, going to see Gordon, Gordon commissioning Reggie to paint, her reaction to the paintings, promotion, the sales, the money laundering? Leslie and her enthusiasm, the word getting around, the rival painters, The Kimono, the clients? Are getting in deeper?
7. Reggie, the painting, the effect, the demands on his revealing himself, his secrecy, the paintings, the plastic bags, his arrangements, Patrice exhibiting them, the reality of the murders? Her visiting the studio? Talking with him, explanations, finding something of his inner self? The exhibition, the Kimono and the interview, the various jealousies?
8. Patrice, having the money, going to the functions, the snide remarks of people? Leslie, her enthusiasm?
9. The gang bosses, the control of Reggie, the links with Gordon? The confrontation at the paintings, the session with Patrice and Reggie?
10. Patrice, the discovery of Reggie’s being a hitman, her vomiting, the video? Interpreted as response to the art? Her idea, greater fraud, the connection with Annika and her assistant, the information about the oligarchs and their paintings? The plan, Miami, the exhibition, the secrecy, everybody assembled, the filming of the encounter, Reggie in the bag over the oligarch, the mobster coming in, killing the oligarch, killing the assistant? Everybody seeing it as video, applauding?
11. The reputation of the bagman? System of carting artworks to diverse, the bodies inside? Reggie, the boat, to Cuba and is disappearing? Patrice, the final conversation with Gordon? And the box arriving at the Kill Room?

SNIPER: ROGUE MISSION

US, 2022, 96 minutes, Colour.

Chad Michael Collins, Ryan Robbins, Sayaka Akimoto, Dennis Hayesbert, Brendan Sexton III, Josh Brenner, Jocelyn Hudon, Paul Essiembre, Erik Athavale.

Directed by Oliver Thompson.

The Sniper franchise began in the early 1990s, the lead being Tom Berenger. The film was popular but, in the 2000s, quite a number of sequels were made, Tom Berenger appearing in some of them, but the establishing of a character, his son, played by Chad Michael Collins, eventually reuniting and working with his father. This film is the 10^th in the series – and there was another to follow.

Chad Michael Collins is not exactly in the pattern of Tom Berenger, rather tall and thin, not quite the military type, but a top Sniper. His friend, Zero, played by Ryan Robbins, appeared in some previous films and continues into the next. And, throughout a number of the films, the CIA chief is played by veteran Dennis Hayesbert. The expert assassin from the previous Sniper film, Sayaka Akimoto is on side with the heroics in this film.

Reactions to this film have been mixed, some praising it as an effective action show, others comparing it quite unfavourably with the previous films. For the record, this reviewer found this episode entertaining in its action drama way.

The focus of the film is on an international human trafficking ring, recruiting in Europe, gathering the women in London, with the support of an American CIA official, transporting them to the United States in containers, setting up outlets for trafficking in the US.

On the one hand, Zero is suspicious of the American official and asks the hero, Beckett, for surveillance on him as he is supposed to arrest the woman who coordinates the trafficking in London. Allegedly, the woman commits suicide, but the official arranges for a false passport and have been transported back to the US in a container with the women.

On the other hand, there is a sequence where a gang, taking orders from the trafficking bosses, invade a caravan where the women are available for online sexual performances – a massacre, though one of the workers advises one woman to escape.

It all comes together when Beckett arrests the corrupt official who demands Beckett’s immediate standing down, challenging the authority of the CIA. Which means, of course, Zero and Beckett will take matters into their own hands, and the assistance of the girl who escapes, are pursued by members of the gang, especially a sniper.

The action keeps moving right throughout – and, there is something of a twist at the end. And audiences should look at the credits, especially at the end, preview of coming attractions and sequels.

1. The popularity of the Sniper franchise? Tom Berenger’s presence? The sequels, the revelation about his son? The son, his talent, Sniper?
2. This title, the mission, human trafficking, Europe, London, containers to the United States, exploitation? The CIA, corrupt officials, Beckett and Zero and the Rogue Mission? Success?
3. The London settings, the Embassy, surveillance, the apartments, the luxury home in the country? The contrast with the United States, the Port, the containers, the setting up of the women, online sexual displays? The raid and the massacre? The city, hotels and refuge, snipers, the shootouts in the street? The musical score?
4. The situation, Beckett and the surveillance, the corrupt official, the woman and her not being arrested, the pictures of her suicide in the bath, his arresting the official, reprimanded by the authorities, the challenge of the corrupt official, Beckett and handing in his badge? His friendship with Zero, Zero suspecting the corrupt official, Beckett returning to the US?
5. Beckett, his challenge to the corrupt official, the boss of the CIA, the challenge to the official, to pursue him, following him to his country house, the setup, the confrontation, his arrest?
6. The scene of the massacre, the squad coming in, the shooting of all the women, Mary Jane being warned by Simon, her escape? Dax as the boss, his rages, Rosie as the tough man, his brother, the sniper? The pursuit of Mary Jane? The sniper, failing to shoot her? The interrogation and the police and shot?
7. Mary Jane, the background story, the phone number for Simon? Beckett and Zero, shielding her, her suspicions, relying on Zero’s ex-wife, her reaction, her enthusiastic husband?
8. The finale in the town, Sniper on the roof, Beckett in the hotel room, the phone messages, Simon giving them the information, his death?
9. Memories of Yuki from the previous film, tracking her down, the diner, her escape, and intelligence Pete helping her, persuading her to collaborate, Pete and his breaking all the codes, Mary Jane with him?
10. Yuki, participation, protecting Mary Jane, the thug, the fight? The sniper, the shootings? Zero and his confrontation with the Dax, the fight in the elevator, Dax and his death? The sniper and his fears – taking the car, returning and embraced by his brother?
11. The information about the Port, the surveillance, the container, Yuki and the fights at the port, the coordinator and her false passport, escaping, on the road, being picked up, the irony of Mary Jane, killing her? Mary Jane then quietly returning to Intelligence Pete and his podcast puzzles?
12. The achievement, the CIA boss, everybody gathering – and getting ready for the next sequel?

THE FABULOUS FOUR

US, 2024, 98 minutes, Colour.

Bette Midler, Susan Sarandon, Megan Mullaly, Sheryl Lee Ralph, Bruce Greenwood, Kadan Well Bennett, Timothy V.Murphy, Michael Bolton.

Directed by Jocelyn Moorhouse.

On the one hand, a 99 minutes promotion campaign for Tik-Tok. On the other hand, a 99 minutes promotion campaign for Tik-Tok.

The title is exciting. Fabulous. And the four are old friends, definitely old, stars Bette Midler born 1945, Susan Sarandon, 1946 and Megan Mullaly and Sheryl Lee Ralph in the mid-1950s. Their friendship in this story goes back more than half a century, back to college days and shared rooms.

But, Marilyn, an irrepressible Bette Midler, audiences enjoying her irrepressibability, is now a widow, takes off for Ernest Hemingway territory, Key West, Florida, where she and her husband of 48 years used to go on vacation. Suddenly, a chance meeting, engagement, marriage again and lots (and lots) of Tik-Tok, Marilyn confessing she is Tik-Tok addict.

What follows is extroverted, ebullient, so a psychology warning. Strong extroverts will be caught up in all the hoopla. Those more introvertedly inclined may well find this too much, possibly needing some breaks, long and frequent pauses when streaming viewing.

Marilyn’s two friends, Alice, a singer, drugs, promiscuous (Megan Mullaly from Will and Grace only much more so) is hard to take. Kitty, Sheryl Lee Ralph, a botanist, with family problems. But there is the very serious Lou, Susan Sarandon, a noted heart surgeon who has strong emotional responses from being once a best friend of Marilyn, now alienated.

Most of the action takes place in a gaudy-looking Key West, plus some affluent bars and mansions.

A lot of the action is frivolous, even farcical, hedonistic and everyone having a splashy good time. But Susan Sarandon and Bruce Greenwood bring some serious dimensions to characters and the situations. Some of their quiet conversations and self-revelations can be a bit of relief for the quiet audience, but long interruptions for those who want to get on with it. And, of course, ultimately there is a move towards apologies and reconciliation.

Surprisingly, the film was directed by Australian Jocelyn Moorhouse (Proof, The Dressmaker). She is certainly letting her hair down here, culminating in an all-dance sequence, “I can see clearly now, the rain has gone…”..

Calling these characters fabulous is, as the Americans might say, pretty much of a stretch.

BABY RUBY

US, 2022, 93 minutes, Colour.

Noemie Merlant, Kit Harrington, Jayne Atkinson, Reed Birney.

Directed by Bess Wohl.

Baby Ruby sounds very nice as a title for a film. However, this is a serious film, touches of anxiety, depression, psychosis.

While the setting is the United States, the leading actors come from outside the US, Noemi Merlant is French and this is referred to, while Kit Harrington, famous for Game of Thrones) is British. He is a butcher in a small American town. She is pregnant, an Influencer with her posts and articles online, with quite a following, especially in the town. At the opening of the film, she is preparing a baby shower for herself and the child to be born.

Response to the film will depend on perspectives and experience. There is the male experience, the experience of fathers. There is the female experience, of pregnancy, giving birth, of post-partum anxiety.

After the birth, Jo finds the continued crying of the baby most stressful. However, over the time, tending the baby, feeding it, getting exasperated, going to the doctor who reassures them that there is nothing wrong with the baby, she becomes more and more depressed, more anxious, some quite erratic behaviour, even sexually, with a neighbour, her husband puzzled, her seeing suspicious aspects everywhere, and the presence and comments from her mother-in-law.

The mother has some hallucinations – and some wondering whether the whole film is something of a hallucination.

The film is a portrait of a mother becoming more and more desperate, a nice husband and his inability to help, a mother-in-law his who is both interfering and supportive.

1. The title, a film about mothers and babies, pregnancy, expectations, birth, post-partum anxieties, psychosis?
2. The American town, ordinary, the butcher, the influence and her friends, testing, doctors, ordinary life, sinister aspects of ordinary life? The musical score?
3. The focus on Jo, French background, in the US, married to Spencer, online, her posts, influence, admired? Spencer, ordinary, the butcher, love for his wife? His mother and her presence, dominating, helpful, critical?
4. The pregnancy, the preparation for the Baby shower, the women arriving, the happy situation? The beginnings of Jo and her apprehensions? The birth?
5. The consequences for Jo, love for the baby, calling her Ruby? Spencer and his devotion? The friends wanting posts about the baby, Jo not putting them online?
6. Audience identification with Jo, women’s perspective, man’s perspective, mothers, fathers, grandparents? Empathy with Jo and her tensions? And the baby crying?
7. The effect on Jo, the continued crying, her anxieties, depression, behaviour? Yet her love for the baby, the books, the visit to the doctor, nothing wrong with the baby, his seeming criticism, her reading, thinking that the baby was trying to communicate with her?
8. The consequences at home, Spencer and his devotion, trying to help, at work? The baby crying, the nights, during the day, outings? Time passing?
9. Doris, her presence, her comments, criticisms, support? Her story about Spencer as a baby and the difficulties?
10. The ominous aspects, the memory of the woman approaching Jo at the store, not allowing her to remove the cover to disturb the baby? Her being part of the group? The later encounter is, in the street?
11. Jo, more anxious, wanting to go out, the party, her drinking, the sexual encounter, as a dream or reality, the aftermath and the woman explaining the experience? Sinister suggestions and suspicions, the meat from the butchers…?
12. The cumulative effect on Jo, medication, institution, becoming calm, coming home again, the baby crying, the baby giving a message?
13. The buildup to the ending, ominous, and the tension for the audience, whatever their experience of babies, for anxiety for mother and child?

DEADPOOL & WOLVERINE

US, 2024, 128 minutes, Colour.

Ryan Reynolds, Hugh Jackman, Emma Corrin, Matthew McFadyen, Jon Favreau, Marina Baccarin, Rob Delaney, Leslie Uggams, Jennifer Garner, Wesley Snipes, Channing Tatum, Chris Evans, Henry Cavill, Tyler Mane, Blake Lively, Nathan Fillion, Matthew McConnaughey.

Directed by Shawn Levy.

 Probably best to say at the outset, Deadpool & Wolverine is beyond review. Within two weeks of its opening around the world, its box office is almost $1 billion. Which means that worldwide, it has been instantly seen by millions. With much more to follow.

It does raise an interesting 2024 question concerning the two films which have been most successful, Inside Out 2 and Deadpool and Wolverine. What they have in common is the animation/cartoon style. And they appeal to a wide audience. However, Inside Out 2 is appealing to deeper human feelings, to sensitivity and empathy. Deadpool & Wolverine is appealing to an emotional bonanza, excitement extravaganza, no holds barred, limitless imagination, potential cosmic destruction, violent visual conflict between good and evil, and superheroes to the rescue. And, not exactly modestly, Deadpool considers himself as a world saviour, a ‘Marvel Jesus’, booking his place in future Christ-figure studies.

There were a lot of writers for this film, including Ryan Reynolds, and it is full of disposable, throwaway quips, some of them very funny, references to the ups and downs of the Marvel film franchise, Disney, a collapsed Fox logo, to Hugh Jackman and his divorce, but there for the attentive satirical ear.

And the film presupposes favourable response to Deadpool in the Ryan Reynolds style (and a later Reynolds variation appears, over nice with the pet dog, Dogpool). Wade Wilson with his mixed history and burnt face, is eager to be in Avengers story, but put on hold. However, as always with American films, there is a bureaucratic British villain, Matthew McFadyen (now widely-known because of his presence in Succession). There is a bureau for saving timelines, there is a threat to the universe, Deadpool is there to combat but the only person he wants to work with is Wolverine. (And a bevy of jokes about a range of alternate Wolverines, visualised comically, all Hugh Jackman-aggressive). Probably this is the moment in a review to mention what one might call hyper-frequent coarse language.

There are also constant references to the previous Deadpool films as well as to the many X-Men films which fans will enjoy (and quite some entertaining references during the final credits). A surprise for the early viewers of the film but now everybody knows, a lot of cameos from previous superheroes like Wesley Snipes as Blade, Jennifer Garner as Electra, and especially Chris Evans as Captain America and a French-accented Channing Tatum. Even Ryan Reynolds’ wife, Blake Lively, appears as Lady Deadpool!

While it is acknowledged with specific reference to Furiosa, a large part of the early film is an extravagant variation on the Mad Max movies. Then we discover a new villain, Cassandra (Emma Corrin), a bald half sister of Patrick Stewart’s Charles (though he and, up till now, we, never knew about her). And she has super destructive powers. Which leads to quite a lot of mayhem, extravagantly high body count, the confrontation with a legion of Deadpool variations and their slaughter – but the power of regeneration and the possibility of it all over again.

So, it looks as though this is the entertainment to cheer worldwide audiences in the Groupe of so many war tensions, civil wars and invasions, terrorism of 2024. As they say, the audiences have been lapping it up – but, those with more restrained sensibilities, might find it more than they can gulp or swallow.

I LOVE MY DAD

US, 2022, 96 minutes, Colour.

Patton Oswalt, James Morosini, Claudia Sulewi, Lil Rel Howery, Rachel Dratch, Amy Landecker.

Directed by James Morosini.

I Love My Dad has been billed as a comedy. But it is a very black comedy, wry, making its audience uncomfortable.

Comedian Patton Oswalt is very effective as the father who has made excuses not to be a at events of his son’s growing up, is worried about his son now an adult, tries to reach out but fails, the son resenting him. He creates the situation of an online friendship, his pretending to be a young woman whom he has seen at a diner, sending her photo, phrasing his own outreach to his son through this waitress character.

The son has mental and emotional problems, resenting his father, lives with his mother, goes to group therapy. But he responds very well to the outreach from Becca, the waitress, the film showing his response, and using the device of having the waitress present in communications with the son, dancing in the street, conversations and advice, sexual encounter.

The father uses his sexual experience with his boss and getting her to phone the son. Later, she realises what she has done, reaches out to the mother who is very angry.

When the father decides to drive his son to meet the waitress, there is a dramatic episode in the diner and the eventual revelation of the truth.

However, there is some forgiveness at the end – and the son himself using the device to get his father to come to live near him and his mother.

The film was written and directed by James Morosini who says that the interaction between father and son is based on his own experience.

1. Based on the experience of the writer-director? Serious, comic?
2. The emotional response of the audience, uncomfortable, identification with father, with son, with mother, with the boss, with Becca the waitress? Mixed emotions?
3. The situation, as explained by the father, the bond with his son, all the excuses for not attending special events, the response of his son? The adult relationship? The father excusing himself, wanting to make amends?
4. The situation of the son, mental health, self-destructive, relationship with his mother? Going to meetings, his glum contribution? His skills in design? Prospects? As a personality, audience identification with him, or not?
5. The father and his plan, discussions with his friend, the reactions of his friend? Warnings? The father and the diner, seeing Becca? The picture? Setting up the situation on the Internet, contacting his son, the son’s response, the continued correspondence, the father and his outreach? Good sense, common sense, mistakes? His relationship with his boss, persuading her to participate? His own sexual experiences, into the texting?
6. The son and his response, enthusing, the correspondence, the device of having Becca present, dancing in the street, the sexual encounter, the conversations, friendship? His complete involvement? His mother’s reaction?
7. The father, the complications of the situation, his son wanting to meet Becca, the father driving all the way? The discussions, the devices of the continuing texting, the effect on the son, the father and his dilemmas, at the motel, in the car?
8. The boss, her contacting the mother, the mother and her anger, her threats to the father?
9. The episode in the diner, the real Becca, the son and his advances and behaviour, the father in the kitchen, keeping the busboy away, the eventual explosion? The father and his confession? The son’s reaction?
10. The son, still loving his father, despite the situation? His job and the references from Becca? And his sending his father the letter about the vacant apartment opposite the house, the father’s rival, the mother’s reaction, the realisation of what it happened?