Displaying items by tag: sergio castellitto

CONCLAVE

UK, 2024, 120 minutes, Colour.

Ralph Fiennes, Stanley Tucci, John Lithgow, Lucian Msamati, Jacek Koman, Brian F.O'Byrne, Isabella Rossellini, Valerio Silva.

Directed by Edward Berger.

Many audiences will be eager to see Conclave because they have read Robert Harris’ exciting novel, the story of the death of the Pope, the gathering the Cardinals, the details required by Vatican regulations, the need for security, the holding of the conclave and the election of a new Pope.

The Catholic audience, especially those with a familiarity with the workings of the Vatican, the nature of the hierarchy, the different perspectives, even of popes during the last half century, a lot to interest, to enjoy, and a provocation especially about stances for going back to consolidate past traditions or an openness to contemporary issues in the wider world and their repercussions for the church.

For non-Catholic audiences, they will enjoy the delineation of characters and their variety, the elaboration of issues, machinations, religious motivations, personal and ecclesiastical challenges. But, it would be by way of observation, the same way non-British audiences may be intrigued by a drama about the intricacies and politics, say, of Britain’s Brexit campaign.

For audiences critical/sceptical about the church, it may seem rather esoteric or politically and ecclesiastically pompous.

But, back to the Catholic perspective. The central character is Cardinal Thomas Lawrence, played in a wonderful  performance by Ralph Fiennes, always intense, but, even when not speaking, the audience very conscious of what concerns him, what he is thinking, what is making demands on him. He has wanted to resign as Dean of the Cardinals but the late Pope has refused. Which means that he has to organise the conclave.

So, there we are in the Sistine Chapel, workers in to protect security, the organisation of desks for the Cardinals, the sisters brought in to cook and cater for the conclave, the arrival of the Cardinals, from many different cultures around the world, some pomp and circumstance, some religious earnestness.

To dramatise  the different points of view, there is the open-minded Cardinal Bellini, Stanley Tucci, the hoped-for candidate from the “progressive/liberal” attendees. On the other hand, there is the almost crusading, very Italianate Cardinal Tedesco, Pietro Castillitto, with an Italy-first mentality, opposed to contemporary changes, and militantly hostile to refugees making their way to Europe. And there are some complications with an African Cardinal from Nigeria, raising issues of sexuality in the church today, and some realities of sexual abuse. And, on the worldly side, the money-political perspective, there is an American Cardinal played by John Lithgow.

There is an unexpectedly Mexican-born missionary in Congo and in Kabul, who arrives, claiming as having been made a cardinal “in pectore”. Isabella Rossellini plays a very forthright nun who has no hesitation in speaking directly to the Cardinals.

Robert Harris’ novels read very well, compelling, covering a wide range of issues from ancient Rome to 20^th century fascist and communist states, to contemporary issues. Which means that he has an interesting story to tell, the filmmakers generally checking to give some kind of authenticity to the storytelling, and an ending which will raise many eyebrows and leave many audiences suddenly shocked and, perhaps, struggling to work out what they think, and some questions for the future church.

1. The popularity of Robert Harris’s novel? A papacy story, 21^st-century?
2. The title, the death of the Pope, the rituals, the gathering the Cardinals, the conclave, the voting, behind-the-scenes? Audience knowledge of conclaves?
3. The Catholic atmosphere, Vatican, the Curia, the Cardinals, International, political stances, religious stances, the enclosure, the discussions, the voting, the black smoke, the white smoke?
4. The situation of the church, the dead pope, criticisms of his being progressive, his keeping tabs on the Cardinals, his hidden report, keeping Cardinal Lawrence as Dean, his dismissal of Cardinal Tremblay? Lawrence going in to break the seal, finding the document? The ceiling of the room, the removal of the body, the smashing of the ring?
5. Fiennes as Cardinal Lawrence, the complete focus of the film on him? The performance, the intensity, communicating the interior questions and doubts? His background, wanting to resign, go to a monastery? His having to organise the conclave? His reliance on O’Malley, Logistics, searching information, interviewing personnel? Mexican priest from Afghanistan? Tremblay and his background? The importance of confidentiality?
6. The background of this logistics, the Sistine Chapel, preparation, security, the accommodation, travel by bus, the rooms, the meals together, the sisters in the kitchen? Audiences appreciating such detail?
7. The key Cardinals? The Nellie, friendship with Lawrence, progressive, his ideas, his declarations, ambitions or not? To disco, irritating, bombastic, conservative, scheming, his following, his outburst after the bomb blasts, his intolerance, racist perspectives on the African Cardinal? Tremblay, American, the Curia, his manoeuvres, financial benefits for followers, arranging the nun from Africa to discredit the African Cardinal? The Cardinal from Milan, the discussions, his concerns? The range of other Cardinals, International, friendships, groups, smoking…?
8. The arrival of the man from Afghanistan, Mexican, his previous mission experience, created a Cardinal, “in pectore”, his arrival, dishevelled, the interview was Lawrence, the discussions about the authenticity, suspicions, acceptance, his background? Presence of the conclave? Lawrence leading the applause from the Cardinals?
9. The assemblies, the voting, the rituals, the county the numbers, the variety over the days, the African Cardinal, the incident with the nun in the dining room, his walking out, Lawrence and the discussions with Sister Agnes, with the nun, confession, learning the truth, the confrontation with a Cardinal, his confession, 30 years earlier, a lapse, his hopes to be Pope, the votes for him, his having to withdraw, sitting alone?
10. The confrontations with Tremblay, the information from the Monsignor who served the Pope, his drinking, last-minute talking to Laurence? Lawrence conferring with the Nellie? Confronting Tremblay, his immediate 40 reaction? Lawrence going into the patron, finding the document, the public exposure, the humiliation of Tremblay?
11. Sister Agnes, her presence, the nuns, forthright, stern, protecting the nun from Africa, standing up to Laurence, sensing the person in the Pope’s room? Her speech, a woman’s voice, the women observing, the strong stand?
12. The changes in fortune, the discussions, the Nellie and his challenge to Laurence, their friendship, his later asking for forgiveness?
13. The Cardinal from Afghanistan, his visit to Laurence, continually voting for him? Lawrence then voting for himself?
14. The tensions in the room, to disco and his behaviour and look? The African Cardinal? Tremblay humiliated?
15. The bomb blast, terrorists, Tedesco’s outburst, the speech by the Mexican, his appeal for unity?
16. The final vote, the election of the Mexican, his acceptance, the name of Innocent? O’Malley, the information about Switzerland, the Institute? Lawrence talking to the Mexican, the surprise of his situation, the transgender issue? His decision?
17. The ending, the future of the church, Pope Innocent, and the revelation? Lawrence looking at the window, the nuns coming out of the building, the end of the film and audiences left to ponder?

FORTUNATA

Italy, 2017, 103 minutes, Colour.

Jasmine Trinca, Stefano Accorsi, Alessandro Borghi, Eduardo Pesce, Nicole Centanni, Hanna Schygulla.

Directed by Sergio Castellitto.

Fortunata is the dramatising of the life of a very emotional woman, a hard background, harsh memories of the death of her father and responsibilities, marriage to a violent man, divorce proceedings, bonding with her daughter but their being tensions, the experience of work with the therapist…

The film has been written by Margarita Mazantini who collaborated with her actor-director husband, Sergio Castillitto. They worked on several films together.

The film was nominated for many awards and actress, Jasmine Trinka, winning several for Best Actress. Her character is highly emotional and the performance dramatises the emotions, sometimes there are extremes. In support is StefanoAccorsi as a sympathetic therapist, Alessandro Borghi as a friend who is bipolar, Eduardo Pesce as her brutal husband, and German actress, memories of her work with Fassbender, Hanna chuygulla as a former actress with dementia.

The treatment is highly emotional, dramatic and melodramatic, but the central performance is certainly commanding and audiences can be swept up into the domestic drama, the behaviour of the brutal husband, menacing and violent, the possible escape with the therapist, at the core relationship of mother and daughter.

1. Title, the irony of Fortunata and her name? The background, Her father, a failed marriage relationship with her daughter, therapist, ambitions, her emotions, careful Chicano? Custody issues?
2. The Italian city, apartments, addresses, therapy offices, the aqueduct, countryside, the visits to Genoa? The musical score?
3. Fortunata’s story, her age, the sequences with her husband, violent brutality, verbal violence and menace, physical violence? The divorce? Her relationship with Barbara, Barbara’s moods, school, dropping the bag, the exasperated mother? Barbara possessive? Fortunata and hair-dressers, the plans, with Chicano, with her friends? The work and preparations? Going to the therapist, observing Barbara? The bond with Patrizio, the outing with him, the travel, his story, the dancing, the sexual experience, the consequences of the relationship? Her husband, the accusations, Chicano and the death of his mother, meeting with the judge, the husband and the filming of his wife and her behaviour? Her losing her daughter?
4. Barbara, her age, relationship with her mother, aggressive, yet dependent, going to the therapist, bonding with him, her drawings, the discussions, his drawing her out of herself? The suspicions of her mother with the therapist? Angry at her mother going away, going to the roof, hurting herself? Her father’s reaction? Going off with him? Finally alienation from her father, bonding again with her mother?
5. Chicano, bipolar, drugs, looking after his mother, gentlemen, the past as an actress, quoting Antigone, his devotion to Fortunata, working with her, the encounter with the Patrizio, his plann for the withdrawal from drugs? The birthday party for his mother, blowing out the candles, her behaviour, her dementia? The walk with her, the memories,his exasperation at her not recognising him, the bridge, accusing him, his memories of the story of Fortunata letting her her father drown, the death of his mother – and the later finding of her body?
6. Patrizio, therapist, the background in Africa, his reputation, his charm, with Fortunata, with Barbara, friendship, smiling, encouraging, the questions, drawing her out of herself, her bonding with hearing? The attraction to Fortunata, the outing with her, taking her to his town, night, the dancing, the room, sex, the return, the crisis on the return, Fortunata and his reaction to her, his trying to help? The final talk between them and her reaction?
7. The culmination, the dramatising of her father’s death, her denial, visualising the water, a verbal description, her father in the water, going out to sea? The issue of blame, a highly emotional reaction to Chicano, wanting to see him, hysterics, her final catharsis with the memories of her father, joining again with Barbara at having a future?