Displaying items by tag: Isabella Rosselini

CONCLAVE

UK, 2024, 120 minutes, Colour.

Ralph Fiennes, Stanley Tucci, John Lithgow, Lucian Msamati, Jacek Koman, Brian F.O'Byrne, Isabella Rossellini, Valerio Silva.

Directed by Edward Berger.

Many audiences will be eager to see Conclave because they have read Robert Harris’ exciting novel, the story of the death of the Pope, the gathering the Cardinals, the details required by Vatican regulations, the need for security, the holding of the conclave and the election of a new Pope.

The Catholic audience, especially those with a familiarity with the workings of the Vatican, the nature of the hierarchy, the different perspectives, even of popes during the last half century, a lot to interest, to enjoy, and a provocation especially about stances for going back to consolidate past traditions or an openness to contemporary issues in the wider world and their repercussions for the church.

For non-Catholic audiences, they will enjoy the delineation of characters and their variety, the elaboration of issues, machinations, religious motivations, personal and ecclesiastical challenges. But, it would be by way of observation, the same way non-British audiences may be intrigued by a drama about the intricacies and politics, say, of Britain’s Brexit campaign.

For audiences critical/sceptical about the church, it may seem rather esoteric or politically and ecclesiastically pompous.

But, back to the Catholic perspective. The central character is Cardinal Thomas Lawrence, played in a wonderful  performance by Ralph Fiennes, always intense, but, even when not speaking, the audience very conscious of what concerns him, what he is thinking, what is making demands on him. He has wanted to resign as Dean of the Cardinals but the late Pope has refused. Which means that he has to organise the conclave.

So, there we are in the Sistine Chapel, workers in to protect security, the organisation of desks for the Cardinals, the sisters brought in to cook and cater for the conclave, the arrival of the Cardinals, from many different cultures around the world, some pomp and circumstance, some religious earnestness.

To dramatise  the different points of view, there is the open-minded Cardinal Bellini, Stanley Tucci, the hoped-for candidate from the “progressive/liberal” attendees. On the other hand, there is the almost crusading, very Italianate Cardinal Tedesco, Pietro Castillitto, with an Italy-first mentality, opposed to contemporary changes, and militantly hostile to refugees making their way to Europe. And there are some complications with an African Cardinal from Nigeria, raising issues of sexuality in the church today, and some realities of sexual abuse. And, on the worldly side, the money-political perspective, there is an American Cardinal played by John Lithgow.

There is an unexpectedly Mexican-born missionary in Congo and in Kabul, who arrives, claiming as having been made a cardinal “in pectore”. Isabella Rossellini plays a very forthright nun who has no hesitation in speaking directly to the Cardinals.

Robert Harris’ novels read very well, compelling, covering a wide range of issues from ancient Rome to 20^th century fascist and communist states, to contemporary issues. Which means that he has an interesting story to tell, the filmmakers generally checking to give some kind of authenticity to the storytelling, and an ending which will raise many eyebrows and leave many audiences suddenly shocked and, perhaps, struggling to work out what they think, and some questions for the future church.

1. The popularity of Robert Harris’s novel? A papacy story, 21^st-century?
2. The title, the death of the Pope, the rituals, the gathering the Cardinals, the conclave, the voting, behind-the-scenes? Audience knowledge of conclaves?
3. The Catholic atmosphere, Vatican, the Curia, the Cardinals, International, political stances, religious stances, the enclosure, the discussions, the voting, the black smoke, the white smoke?
4. The situation of the church, the dead pope, criticisms of his being progressive, his keeping tabs on the Cardinals, his hidden report, keeping Cardinal Lawrence as Dean, his dismissal of Cardinal Tremblay? Lawrence going in to break the seal, finding the document? The ceiling of the room, the removal of the body, the smashing of the ring?
5. Fiennes as Cardinal Lawrence, the complete focus of the film on him? The performance, the intensity, communicating the interior questions and doubts? His background, wanting to resign, go to a monastery? His having to organise the conclave? His reliance on O’Malley, Logistics, searching information, interviewing personnel? Mexican priest from Afghanistan? Tremblay and his background? The importance of confidentiality?
6. The background of this logistics, the Sistine Chapel, preparation, security, the accommodation, travel by bus, the rooms, the meals together, the sisters in the kitchen? Audiences appreciating such detail?
7. The key Cardinals? The Nellie, friendship with Lawrence, progressive, his ideas, his declarations, ambitions or not? To disco, irritating, bombastic, conservative, scheming, his following, his outburst after the bomb blasts, his intolerance, racist perspectives on the African Cardinal? Tremblay, American, the Curia, his manoeuvres, financial benefits for followers, arranging the nun from Africa to discredit the African Cardinal? The Cardinal from Milan, the discussions, his concerns? The range of other Cardinals, International, friendships, groups, smoking…?
8. The arrival of the man from Afghanistan, Mexican, his previous mission experience, created a Cardinal, “in pectore”, his arrival, dishevelled, the interview was Lawrence, the discussions about the authenticity, suspicions, acceptance, his background? Presence of the conclave? Lawrence leading the applause from the Cardinals?
9. The assemblies, the voting, the rituals, the county the numbers, the variety over the days, the African Cardinal, the incident with the nun in the dining room, his walking out, Lawrence and the discussions with Sister Agnes, with the nun, confession, learning the truth, the confrontation with a Cardinal, his confession, 30 years earlier, a lapse, his hopes to be Pope, the votes for him, his having to withdraw, sitting alone?
10. The confrontations with Tremblay, the information from the Monsignor who served the Pope, his drinking, last-minute talking to Laurence? Lawrence conferring with the Nellie? Confronting Tremblay, his immediate 40 reaction? Lawrence going into the patron, finding the document, the public exposure, the humiliation of Tremblay?
11. Sister Agnes, her presence, the nuns, forthright, stern, protecting the nun from Africa, standing up to Laurence, sensing the person in the Pope’s room? Her speech, a woman’s voice, the women observing, the strong stand?
12. The changes in fortune, the discussions, the Nellie and his challenge to Laurence, their friendship, his later asking for forgiveness?
13. The Cardinal from Afghanistan, his visit to Laurence, continually voting for him? Lawrence then voting for himself?
14. The tensions in the room, to disco and his behaviour and look? The African Cardinal? Tremblay humiliated?
15. The bomb blast, terrorists, Tedesco’s outburst, the speech by the Mexican, his appeal for unity?
16. The final vote, the election of the Mexican, his acceptance, the name of Innocent? O’Malley, the information about Switzerland, the Institute? Lawrence talking to the Mexican, the surprise of his situation, the transgender issue? His decision?
17. The ending, the future of the church, Pope Innocent, and the revelation? Lawrence looking at the window, the nuns coming out of the building, the end of the film and audiences left to ponder?

LA CHIMERA

Italy, 2023, 130 minutes, Colour.

Josh O’Connor, Carol Duarte, Isabella Rossellini, Alba Rohrwacher, Lou Roy-Lecollinet

Directed by Alice Rohrwacher.

Response to La Chimera may very much depend on mood and frame of mind as we choose to watch it.

The film has had some glowing reviews and Festival awards, with words like “poetic”, “magical”, being used to praise it. So, for the poetic frame of mind, no worries. But for audiences who might subscribe to a more prosaic, realistic frame of mind, perhaps not.

We are in Italy, a remote part of Tuscany, industrial, docks, poorer, dilapidated abandoned railway station, makeshift huts on mountainsides. There is a town, the streets, the cafe, but hard times.

The film was written by Alice Rohrwacher, a director with a strong reputation (Happy as Lazzaro). The star is the British actor, Josh O’Connor (Prince Charles in The Crown, Challengers), and a cast of Italian actors with an enjoyable cameo by Isabella Rossellini as a retired singer, demanding matriarch.

In the plot, while the setting is remote, the source of income is much more remote. It is treasure from buried in Etruscan tombs, with the locals digging them up, fixing and mending, and negotiating with an unseen dealer who markets them to wealthy international collectors.

So what is an Englishman doing in this setting? He is an archaeologist with a gift for divining the buried relics (using a forked branch). But he has lost his love, longing for her, dreams of her, and is returning to the town after serving a prison sentence.

He is taciturn, sombre, going to visit the singer but trying to avoid his ragtag band of past collaborators. But he does go back to divining, is attracted to the singer’s maid – and loosens up a little, but generally, a morose hangdog look.

.

There is background drama with the town’s characters, some comic touches (action speeded up at one stage in the character giving her opinion straight to camera). The critics have praised the evocative cinematography, the poetic aspects. And then there is a cameo from veteran actress Alba Rohrwacher (the director’s older sister) in an unexpected character.

There is some excitement towards the end with a significant discovery of a shrine in statue of goddess – and criminal shenanigans and small wheeler- deals.

An unexpected and offbeat drama.

1. The title? The visual images and cards?
2. The Italian setting, Tuscany, the remote town, the docks, the streets, the cafe, the abandoned railway station, ramshackle homes, makeshift huts on the mountains? The contrast with the city, the buildings, business dealings, the yacht on the lake, the option? The musical score, the range of songs and their lyrics illustrating the themes?
3. Critical acclaim, poetic and magical? Festivals and awards? For the poetic imagination? Not for the realist imagination?
4. The introduction to Arthur, in the train, with the young women, his comments, flirting, the salesman and his attack, comment on his smell? The white suit? The dream, his lost love? The mystery of an Englishman in Italy? The mysterious, poetic, dream sequences throughout the film, and the reprise of this same journey and characters later in the film?
5. His arrival in the town, his friends meeting him, his not wanting to join them, is going to Flora’s house, the discussions with her, the lost love and the memories, the symbolism of her face, the son following them, the red thread on the ground and the later snapping of the thread after he sees it in the cave?
6. His going to his makeshift huts, trying to settle back, meeting up with the friends, their work, personalities, the preparation for the Festival, the masks, the town and rejoicing?
7. Arthur, his background, archaeology, his knowledge, the forked branch, trees upturned, the maid seeing them, pulling them out, the signals for the buried relics? upset? But his returning to the divining, finding the tombs, the contents, in the town, the group mending and fixing, the contact with Spartaco, Arthur indebted to Spartaco, going into the city and the office, the financial deals, not seeing Spartaco, meeting with her niece?
8. The character of Italia, her background, her two children, the daughter older, the sleeping boy, concealing them? Wanting to sing? Serving as a maid to Flora? Flora and her household, the various women, their arguments? The visit to the railway station, her leg, the wheelchair? The railway station abandoned?
9. Arthur, the attraction to Italia, going out with her, the Festival, the dancing, on the shore, the the sand above the hidden tombs, the discovery of the grave, her threatening the police,?
10. Arthur and the discovery, in the tunnel, the shrine, the statue, the gifts? To get them out, breaking off the head? The seeming police? Spartaco’s henchmen disguised as police? Their getting the statue, packing it, transferring it to the yacht?
11. Italia, the children, setting up a centre for them in the abandoned station, redecorating it? Her collaborators?
12. The information about the yacht, Spartaco and her niece and explanations, the scenes of the auction, the wealthy clientele, Spartaco as a woman, her dress and style? The group coming to the auction, the intrusion, trying to bargain with Arthur, his mood, exasperation, throwing the head into the sea, the scene of drowning at the bottom of the sea?
13. The consequences for the group? The consequences for Arthur? The presence of the police throughout but their not being able to convict?
14. Arthur, his wanderings, finding the new cave, exploring, the thread and memories of his love?

SPACEMAN

US, 2024, 103 minutes, Colour.

Adam Sandler, Carey Mulligan, Paul Dano, Kunal Nayyar, Isabella Rossellini, Lena Olin.

Directed by Johan Renck.

Spaceman is certainly a generic title. It could suggest a film about space exploration. It could suggest dramatic conflicts in space. And, it could suggest a variation on a space Odyssey.

In fact, there is something of all three possibilities here.

The star is Adam Sandler, many audiences not expecting to find him in such a serious performance after his decades of comedies, broad comedies, romantic comedies. However, in collaboration with Netflix, he has appeared in some serious roles including Uncut Gems and a particularly affecting performance as a coach in Hustle.

And, it should be said at the beginning, that Adam Sandler acquits himself very well as the spaceman, Jacub.

There is a technology side of this kind of film, the vast space craft in the future, its capacity for travelling even as far as Jupiter, the enormous interiors of the craft as well as all the signs for its maintenance, progress, and communication with. And, with a huge pink cloud hovering over Earth for several years, this is also space exploration, a mission with a single spaceman, well trained and prepared, already six months out on his travel towards Jupiter to discover the nature of this pink cloud.

But, in a different kind of way, it is also something of a space Odyssey. In 1968, Stanley Kubrick brought the phrase, Space Odyssey, into our vocabulary (over a year before the 1969 moon landing). While there is a great deal of space exploration in Kubrick’s masterpiece, there is also a philosophical (even theological) probing of what is beyond human experience, the transcendent, symbolised in that film by a vast evenly planed monolith, appearing in prehistoric times, but also present and moving through the future universe. (And one can think of such films as Gravity, First Man, Ad Astra.)

But, this time the transcendent is introduced highly imaginatively, a giant spider creature tarantula-like, an alien whose community has been destroyed, who is a survivor, interested in preserving humans, learning the language, trying to understand the motivation of the exploration. He is called Hanus and is voiced persuasively by Paul Dano.

At first, Jacub is wary, hostile, but with the conversations and the questions, gradually a report between the two, Hanus and his probing, Jacob, having already experienced some personal crisis with his wife leaving him and not communicating with him, forced to look into himself, testing himself about what he really values, even risking everything to rescue Hanus.

Which means that the transcendent themes and the personal, family themes are brought together.

Carey Mulligan plays Jacub’s disaffected wife, Lena Olin has a cameo as her mother, and Isabella Rossellini has a significant cameo role as the very businesslike public relations person behind the mission.

The film has been directed by Johan Renck, prolific video music video director, also of the challenging television series, Chernobyl.

1. The title and focused? Expectations? Space exploration? A space Odyssey?
2. The director, his reputation, videos, television series, Chernobyl? Adam Sandler in the central role, audience expectations, comic, serious?
3. The vision of the future, space exploration? The strange pink cloud hovering over earth? The origins in Jupiter and beyond? The boundaries of the universe, its mystery, evolution, origins? Spacecraft and their complexities, the single spaceman? Contact with control? The visuals of the craft, space, of the mystery?
4. Jakub? The original novel, Czech Republic, keeping the characters and setting? His life, the flashbacks, relationship with his father, informant, politics, his death? A cloud hovering over him? The flashbacks and the encounters with Lenka, love, flirting, the marriage, her pregnancy, the miscarriage? His professionalism, but his absence? Always being away, next pregnancy? The decision to leave him? The videos and his memories, his not living up to them? Attempts to contact her, moving away? Her refusal, going to stay with her mother, the contacts and the excuses, the cover? The effect on him?
5. The contact on the ground, Peter, friendship, the contact, the support, the subterfuge about Lenka leaving, the press conference, Tuma and her poise, PR, covering the situation, her authority, going to visit Lenka, not communicating that she had left? The visit and talk?
6. Jakub, his vision, exploration, the mystery are science, transcendence?
7. Hanus and his appearance, the form of the spider, the visuals of the spider, size, movement, threat? Real? An alien, his voice, explanation of origins, the attack, adrift, learning and observing about humans, language? Initial interactions with Jakub? The voice and tone to Paul Dano?
8. Lenka, the present, her reaction to Jakub, leaving, the message, going to see her mother, her mother support, the pregnancy, memories of happy days, the miscarriage, sadness, Jakub and his absences? The appeal to her to make contact?
9. Hanus, his presence, Jakub’s initial reaction, fear, antipathy, the breaking down the barriers, the pace to suit with Hanus, the talk, the revelation, the cosmic dimensions, origins, the interactions between the two, companionship, emotions, Hanus in space, Jakub and the rescue? The effect of Hanus always referring to Jakub as “skinny human”.
10. The breaking of the mission, the change in Jakub, the journey becoming personal? And the commitment to Hanus?
11. The robbery with the South Koreans, mentioning them, the pursuit, the rescuing Jakub and his working with them?
12. His future, possible reconciliation?
13. A 21^st-century variation on a space Odyssey?