Displaying items by tag: Uma Thurman

THE KING OF KINGS

South Korea/US, 2025, 100 minutes, Colour.

Voices of: Kenneth Branagh, Oscar Isaac, Uma Thurman, Pierce Brosnan, Mark Hamill, Forest Whitaker, Ben Kingsley, Jim Cummings, Roman Griffin Davis.

Directed by Seong-ho Jang.

Yes, the Gospel story. However, this film is an animation-dramatisation of a story by Charles Dickens, a story he wrote in the 1840s for his family, recited every Christmas by the author and read aloud in succeeding family generations, Dickens forbidding publication. However, in 1934, the family made it available over 60 years after the death of the author.

At the beginning of his story, Dickens wrote: My Dear Children, I am very anxious that you should know something about the History of Jesus Christ. For everybody ought to know about Him. No one ever lived who was so good, so kind, so gentle, and so sorry for all people who did wrong, or were in any way ill or miserable, as He was.

This film was made by a South Korean animator, Seong-go Jang, in Korean studios but uses the voices of some very talented English speakers, British and American.

Dickens told the story to his family and in this film he tells it to his younger son, Walter, quite a spirited boy, absorbed by stories of King Arthur, swords and dragons. And he disrupts his father’s presentation on stage of Scrooge and A Christmas Carol.  s Dickens’ sympathetic wife urges him to tell the Gospel story, the young boy becoming more and more interested, initially wanting kings and dragons, but drawn into the story and following the person of Jesus. And, all the while, accompanied by his mischievous cat.

Which means that this is definitely a film for the younger audiences, but could be a pleasure for the whole family.

The animation style is vivid, the characters, the backgrounds, sometimes gently quiet with Jesus healing, with the apostles, at other times very vivid, especially Jesus walking on the water in the overwhelming storm. A great deal of the time is given to the Last Supper, the agony in the garden, Judas betrayal, uses trial and Caiaphas and Pilate, the crucifixion. Audiences who enjoy animation stories like this style and treatment.

But, a key element of the screenplay is having the young boy enter into all the action, observing close-up, being with Jesus, listening, watching, admiring, dismayed… And, at times, Dickens himself comes with his son into the action, close-up, and all the while with Kenneth Branagh’s narration as Dickens. The device of having Walter within the Gospel story is a great means for younger audiences also entering in, identifying, learning about Jesus and his story with a devout theme-highlighting commentary by Dickens.

St Ignatius Loyola founder of the Jesuits, would probably endorse this film. In his Spiritual Exercises, he urges those making retreats, or at any time with gospel contemplations, to enter into the scene, to be there, to experience the Gospels. And, a great challenge to those on retreat is to ask them where they are in the scene, at a distance observing, or very close to Jesus. This film dramatises what this closeness could be like.

The voice cast is very strong, not only Kenneth Branagh, but Uma Thurman as his wife, Mark Hamill is an extraordinarily rambunctious and King Herod pantomime-like , Ben Kingsley is a thundering villainous high priest, Caiaphas, Pierce Brosnan is a disdainful Pontius Pilate – and Oscar Isaac is Jesus.

In 2000, the animated film, The Miracle Maker, with Ralph Fiennes as the voice of Jesus, was very successful in portraying the Gospel stories. Now, The King of Kings is a very welcome addition.

1. How successful as a Gospel film? This, the range of the Gospel episodes?
2. Charles Dickens’ story, for his family, here for his son, the urging of his wife?
3. The style of animation, from South Korea, the quality of the voice cast?
4. The opening, A Christmas Carol, the story of Scrooge, Dickens in the theatre, interrupted by his son, Walter, King Arthur, dragons and sword, stubborn in reacting to his father, the cat, all the disruption, the pages scattered and torn? The audience watching, Walter and the cat? Dickens and his response?
5. Dickens, his patient wife, urging Dickens to tell the story of the Gospels? Dickens own appreciation of the Gospel story, his admiration for Jesus, the tone of his narrative in telling the story?
6. The visuals, journey to Bethlehem, the appearance of the angels, shepherds and magi, Herod and his overreaction, the indications of persecution of the innocent children, the flight into Egypt, Jesus growing up, the return to Galilee, the finding in the temple, Jesus emerging as an adult.
7. The device of having Walter go into the action, with his cat, gradually understanding, becoming involved, emotions, observing and then becoming very close to Jesus?
8. The familiar gospel sequences of Jesus’ public life, the elaborate temptations in the desert, the choosing of the apostles, Peter and the fishing, the healing of the crippled man, the casting out of the Demon, Jesus’ encounters, Mary and the request about Lazarus, the raising of Lazarus, the anointing of Jesus, the complaints of Judas, the entry into Jerusalem, building up the picture of Jesus? Especially the dramatisation of Jesus walking on the water, Peter and his walking, drowning, appeal to Jesus?
9. The Last Supper, Agony in the Garden, Judas and his deal with kindness, the reaction of the scribes and Pharisees, planning to kill Jesus, this, the emphasis on healing the servant’s ear with Peter and the sword, the trial and Caiaphas thundering, rousing the crowd, the choice between Barabbas and Jesus, Pontius Pilate washing his hands, scourging, crowning with thorns, the way to Calvary, the crucifixion, the thieves and the good thief, Jesus’ death? The importance of the resurrection?
10. Dickens entering into the scenes with his son? The effect of the story on Walter, sharing it with the other children?
11. The telling of the Gospel stories with an appeal to the children’s audience and to families?

OH CANADA

US, 2024, 91 minutes, Colour.

Richard Gere, Jacob Elordi, Uma Thurman, Victoria Hill, Michael Imperioli, Caroline Dhavarnas, Penelope Mitchell.

Directed by Paul Schrader.

A Paul Schrader film, written and directed by him, based on the novel, Forgone, by American novelist, Russell Banks, with whom Schrader had collaborated in the film version of Banks’ novel, Affliction, 1998. Schrader notes that he had three bouts of Covid and hospitalisation, saying that he became more conscious of mortality, was interested in Forgone  and collaborated with Banks who preferred the title Oh Canada – and then Banks himself dying while the film was in production. Prior to Oh Canada, Schrader was focusing on older men reviewing their lives, First Reform, Card Counter, Master Gardener.

Watching Oh Canada is both an interesting and intriguing experience.

The film opens with an ominous comment that a son has not seen his father for 30 years. Then the setting up of cameras by a documentary filmmaking trio in the house of a famous documentary filmmaker, Leonard Fyfe, now in his 80s, dying of cancer, an opportunity for him to tell his story for the television audience. The crew have been Leo’s former students, as has been his wife, Emma, living with him for 30 years and concerned for his health and the strain of doing the interview. The other character during the filming is Leo’s full-time nurse.

It is usually pointed out that Paul Schrader came from a strict Calvinist background and has been concerned with religious themes in many of his films. This is not just a documentary about the life and career of Leo, but his opportunity to face the truth and lies of his life, seduction and exploitation, but also skills as a filmmaker and lecturer.

And Leo is played impressively by Richard Gere in his mid-70s, old, almost bald, stubbled chin, experiencing the pain of cancer, determined to go through with the interview, despite the effort and strain, by to tell the truth, uncovering lies, and all the time dedicating this to his wife who, he says, has never known him fully.

The intriguing part of the experience is the range of flashbacks, not always in chronological order, moments of memories by Leo, puzzle pieces for the audience to put together. And, some of them are in bright colour, others in black and white, often stark. So the memories are invested with moods, colourful and severe. Most of them go back to 1968, Leo aged 26, his hometown and family, the calling in the priest for a family discussion about his future, his marriage, a son, pregnant wife, prospects, the Vietnam war, the draft, and his decision to avoid the draft – Oh Canada.

The young Leo is played by Jacob Elordi, making an effective contrast with Richard Gere, though Schrader also using the device of having the older, but healthier, Gere take Elordi’s place in many of the sequences of the past. His wife, Emma, is played by Uma Thurman (and, indicating confusion of memories, she also plays the wife of his artist friend in 1968.)

There is discussion about photography and filmmaking in black and white flashbacks to the 1990s and his academic career and his eager students.

With the filmmaking, Leo has the opportunity for some kind of assessment of his life, acknowledging the good and the bad, the hurt to others, deceit and lies, an opportunity for truth in the deathbed confession.

1. The title, the national anthem of Canada, the perspective of Canada in 1968, draftees avoiding Vietnam? Life in Canada?
2. The settings, Montréal and the house, interiors, the filming? Massachusetts towns, in the 60s? Richmond Virginia? Vermont? The Canadian border? The atmospheric score?
3. The work of Paul Schrader, his later interest in older men and coping with life? The adaptation of Russell Banks novel? as writ Schrader er and director?
4. The situation, Leonard Fyfe, the opening comment by his son not meeting his father for 30 years? The documentary filmmakers, setting up, Leo and his health, cancer, weak, agreeing to the film? His having taught Emma, Malcolm, Victoria 30 years earlier? His agreeing to do the interview, his impatience? A deathbed confession?
5. The structure of the film, the interview in 2023, the many flashbacks to 1968, the flashbacks to the classes in the 90s? The range of flashback memories? The style of the film, muted colour for the interview, bright colour for some of the flashbacks, the many black and white flashbacks?
6. Richard Gere, his career, in his mid-70s, portraying a dying man, but also the flashbacks the 1990s and teaching, and the insertion of the older Leo instead of the younger Leo in flashbacks? Jacob Elordi as the younger Leo?
7. Leo reviewing his life, facts, lies, confessions, confusions? The effect on him, wanting to keep going, wanting Emma to be present, for her to know the man she married, his tiredness, the nurse, going to the toilet? Coming back, his insistence? Finally stopping, his attitude towards the filmmakers? In his room, with Emma and the nurse, Sloane putting the camera in the room, the filmmakers watching his dying scene?
8. Leo, his family, his home town? His wandering, the relationship with Amy, her pregnancy, loving her not, the encounter with Amanda, sexual relationship? Meeting Alicia, the marriage, her son, her pregnancy, Leo and his writing, the prospect for teaching, going to Vermont, the pressure from his father-in-law and his brother, to work for the firm? The break, his going away, not seeing his son for 30 years, the loss of contact with Alicia?
9. The various pieces of his story, 1968, the draft, his lining up, costume, questions about being gay, his answers, awaiting his documents? Going to Vermont, hiring the car, the scene in the shop, the clothes, stealing the money and the clothes? Visiting Stanley, the conversations, Stanley and draft dodgers, his art, relationships, Gloria (and being played by Uma Thurman), the sexual encounter, his leaving?
10. The visit to his hometown, the diner, memories of his family? the family discussion, all in the priest, his declaration going to Cuba – is not getting there, the story of his crossing America like Jack Kerouac, the calling of the priest for advice?
11. Going to the border, the signpost, his choice, standing in the field, the sign, his crossing the border to his future?
12. The documentary makers, past students, the scenes of their eagerly listening to him, his invention of the camera and looking at the interviewer on camera, his comments on Susan Sontag and photography, the meetings, the tutorials? His relationship with Emma and Victoria?
13. Marrying Emma, the 30 years, her devotion to him, her concern in his illness, during the interview?
14. Leo and his career, the film about testing weapons, the glimpses of his further films, about exploitation of the Arctic, about the sex offending Bishop? His reputation? His being introduced, bringing Emma on stage?
15. The encounter with his son, the son driving to the screening, talking to his father, Leo turning his back and disowning him? The son and his conversation with Emma? The news about what happened to Alicia?
16. The final death scene, Emma and the nurse, breathing his last, having made his confession?