Displaying items by tag: Romola Garai

THE CRITIC

UK, 2023, 101 minutes, Colour.

Ian McKellen, Gemma Arteton, Mark Strong,Ben Barnes, Lesley Manville, Romoloa Garai, Alfred Enoch, Claire Skinner.

Directed by Anand Tucker.

An uneasy and uncomfortable cinema experience in the company of this particular theatre critic, a compelling performance by Ian McKellen as a 1934 London theatre critic, Jimmy Erskine.

Watching The Critic, a reviewer can take comfort in the role of mediator between a film or a play and its audience, open to the possibilities, appreciating the experience likes and dislikes, offering an opinion to the reader. As we see here, the critic, even though working for a media outlet, can be a self-appointed arbiter of taste, of what they consider good or bad, assuming an arrogant role, pronouncing judgement, pronouncing sentence. If ever there was a supreme example of this kind of critic, Ian McKellen brings him to life. (Which is not to say that this is how Jimmy Erskine, the critic, lives his alcoholic, promiscuous, aesthetic, actual life.)

And, the period is 1934. Oswald Moseley’s fascists, black shirts and badges are patrolling the streets, ready for violence, especially hounding homosexuals. In his role of critic, and in his manner, and in his sometimes malevolently crafted statements (as if fact) indicate that he has a fascist mentality.

There is no character really to like in this film. The other protagonist is an ambitious young actress, Nina Land (Gemma Arteton) urged on by her sympathetic mother (Lesley Manville), the target of Erskine’s hostility for 10 years. When she decides to confront the critic, there is an unholy alliance temptation, honesty and pacts, and malicious destruction.

The story has a central core of characters and a gradual revelation on the interconnections, the proprietor of a popular newspaper, played with serious intensity by Mark Strong. There is an artist, Ben Barnes, infatuated with the actress. There is his wife, daughter of the newspaper proprietor. Also in the picture is Tom (Alfred Enoch), the critic’s secretary and live-in companion.

Erskine, disliked by the proprietor who is urging restraint in the reviews, is on the verge of being sacked after 40 years. What happens when arrogance is threatened? And arrogant assumptions that victory is inevitable?

The film shows the repercussions of malevolence under polite veneer. Ian McKellen, in his mid-80s, relishes this opportunity to dramatise evil (although, we remember he had been Richard III as well as in the X-Men as Magneto). In many ways, we, the audience, are being drawn into the evil plot despite ourselves and our disgust. The supporting cast is strong, generally playing upper-class types who presume on their class. Ultimately, the issue is conscience leading to some kind of truth and exposure – but really no conscience for the arrogant critic.

1. The title, expectations? The original novel, the work of playwright Patrick mother? The British cast?
2. The 1930s, the prewar atmosphere, the UK, the presence of Oswald Moseley and the fascists? (The film critic and his fascist behaviour?)
3. The period, homes, flats, theatre, proscenium, audience, backstage? The press? The London streets, pubs, restaurants? Atmosphere? The musical score?
4. The portrait of Jim Erskine, Ian McKellen’s presence and performance, the theatre critic, theatrical in his presence and behaviour? Arrogant, opinions, judgements, sentences? His freedom to express himself, no matter the hurt? His friends and contrary, at the club? Their careers, older, on the downturn? His aesthetic, his indulgent life, sexuality, violence and vengeful, no scruple?
5. The situation, the press Baron, his death, his son taking over, the meeting, the advice to turn down the the reviews, Erskine’s reaction? His decision to bring the press Baron down?
6. Nina, performance, nervousness, 10 years, her mother and influence, coaxing Erskine and his discussed? Discussions with her, the mother’s pressures, Nina visiting Erskine, their discussions, bonding, using each other? His praising her in reviews? The planning of the seduction, her previous relationship with Nick, the portrait painter, his wife, the separation? Reuniting with Nina? Nina and the experience with the press Baron, the seduction and her manner, performance? The effect, his going out and shooting himself? Her reaction? Confronting Erskine, his anger, upset, her death?
7. The press Baron, aristocratic, generally decent man, his wife, infatuated with Nina? His daughter, married to Nick, the effect of the experience with Nina, the aftermath, killing himself?
8. Nick, his situation, the marriage, separation, the children and their interventions, his affair with Nina, resuming it? With Erskine, painting the portrait? Painting the club members, the exclusion of Erskine? His hopes, – with Nina’s death?
9. His wife, the attitude, her father, the taking over of the company, her determination to destroy Erskine?
10. Erskine, his orientation, his behaviour, prowling and partners, the police, the Moseley fascists? The ridicule, the fights? His arrest, interrogation, his condemnation?
11. Tom, living in with Erskine, helping with the reviews, the writing? His conscience, going to action against Erskine?
12. Erskine, in jail, the letter, any remorse?

SCOOP

UK, 2024, 102 minutes, Colour.

Gillian Anderson, Rufus Sewell, Keeley Hawes, Billie Piper, Romola Garia, Amanda Redmond, Conor  Swindells, Jordan Kouame, Richard Goulding, Alex Waldmann.

Directed by Philip Martin.

Pre-review comment about words and changing meanings. Perhaps we think of scoop in connection with ice cream. One definition of the word is: a utensil resembling a spoon, with a short handle and a deep bowl, used for removing dry or semi-solid substances from a container. But, for quite some time, Evelyn Waugh used it for the title of his 1938 novel, scoop as: a piece of news published by a newspaper or broadcast by a television or radio station in advance of its rivals.

Many will remember the 2019 BBC interview with Prince Andrew and his connection with sexual predator, Jeffrey Epstein, criticisms of his behaviour and friendship, photos of the two, public interest especially at the time of Epstein suicide in jail. And, there are accusations against Prince Andrew. The Prince, and the Palace, agreed that he could be interviewed on the prime BBC program, Newsnight. It was meant to be a vindication of Prince Andrew. He spoke confidently but the consequences were disastrous leading to his retiring from royal functions and losing his honours.

This is a very interesting look at the background of getting this interview to air. It is a focus on Prince Andrew himself and not any analysis of Jeffrey Epstein. There have been many documentaries on this subject. Rather, the initial focus is on the brashly self-confident producer, Sam McAlister (Billie Piper), working outside expect to norms and procedures, taking initiatives to the sometimes disapproval of her colleagues. She had connections, was alert to opportunities, to meetings, phone calls, conversations. And we see in some detail how she was able to persuade Prince Andrew’s staff, especially his very loyal assistant, Amanda Thirsk (Keeley Hawes) as well as the BBC authorities.

The decision was that skilled interviewer, Emily Maitlis (Gillian Anderson) would front the interview. She is presented as confidently idiosyncratic. But she prepares, works carefully on the questions, and we see in some detail sections of the interview, her timing, her probing, and Prince Andrew (Rufus Sewell looking very much like the Prince) offering his answers. Pleased at the end of the interview.

However, the public response was very negative, the public not believing his comments about Epstein and his friendship, staying with Epstein in New York, the accusations of the young woman against him, and his remembering taking his children for a pizza, his comments that he did not sweat at the time…

While this is an interesting film with a perspective on members of the British Royal family, it is very much a film about the media, enthusiastic and enterprising producers, BBC politics, procedures and protocols, astute interviewers, and the power of television and public opinion.

1. The title, the world of media, scoops, significant stories, sensational stories, investigations, public exposure?
2. The film based on actual characters and events? Audience awareness of the characters, of the events? Jeffrey Epstein and his sexual abuse? Ghislaine Maxwell? Prince Andrew?
3. The focus on the interview with Prince Andrew? The film not trying to explore Jeffrey Epstein and his career crimes, suicide? The situation for Prince Andrew, the arrests of Jeffrey Epstein, his suicide? The photo from 2010 in the park? The situation for the media, for Buckingham Palace, for an interview, Prince Andrew and the media, the world understanding him? The backfire?
4. The film’s commentary on the media, the BBC and its aims, serious, wider audiences? The press, television, photojournalists – and the opening with the journalists trying to photograph Jeffrey Epstein, his house, people coming in and out, the young women over the years, Prince Andrew, the pursuit in the park, getting the best position, successfully getting the photo? Its being published? The effect on the Royal family, Prince Andrew, his staff?
5. The portrait of Prince Andrew, reversals performance, made up like the Prince? His mannerisms, way of speech? An opportunity for the audience to see Prince Andrew and understand him better – or worse? His staff, Amanda and her long devotion, admiration for the prince, his reliance on her but seeming not to notice? Employing the press agent, the discussions about his appearance on television, the scenes of his public work and charity? People not attending? The suicide, the pressure on the Prince? His consciousness of his mother? Memories of his mother coming his hair in the past? The decision to go on television, the meeting with Emily Maitless and Sam McAllister, the presence of the Princess Beatrice, her frank comments about her father and reputation? His agreement for the television interview?
6. Sam McAllister, the film based on her book, her role as producer, determined, the background of her mother encouraging her, her son and his girlfriend, and her care for him? The role of the BBC, the prospect of sackings? Her way of producing, going out, the criticisms from the other members, the contact with Amanda, at the palace, going out for a drink, the issue of Jeffrey Epstein, her discovering more, Prince Andrew, with Emily meatless and the other produces? Her not being included, her mother’s advice, going forward? Involved? Her continued presence?
7. The BBC, the program, Newsnight, Emily Maitlis and her reputation, personality, dog, the walk in the park, changing attitudes towards Sam? The meeting with the prince, the decisions, the BBC officials, the Director at the Opera, the go-ahead? Her preparation, the staff in discussions about the questions, the device of having her ask the staff the question and testing it, the Prince and sharing answers to his staff? Raising the issues? The protocols, the table, the room, distance apart, what to wear?
8. The probing of the issues, Jeffrey Epstein himself, his way of life, the island, mansions, the girls, the trafficking? The encounter with Prince Andrew? The Bill Clinton references and Emily Maitlis angry at Monica Lewinsky’s treatment and misogyny? Mention of Trump? The arrest, the case, imprisonment? Ghislaine Maxwell and the princes friendship? The contacts, the parties, the dinners, 2010, the Prince staying at the house, breaking ties? The photo of the Prince, Virginia Jgiuffre and her testimony, the Prince and his memory and denials?
9. The actual interview, based on the real interview, the audience getting the chance to see Emily Maitlis, thinking, probing, questions, giving the Prince space to speak as Sam recommended? The responses of the as one, confident, hesitations, excuses, the issue of the dates, the pizza, his daughters, the sweating? His satisfaction with the interview? And the palace?
10. The preparations, the promotions, the night itself? The audience? The immediate responses, online responses, the condemnations of the Prince?
11. The reaction of the palace, the Queen, his being relieved of his duties?
12. The film and the probing of the Jeffrey Epstein case, abuse, victims, the final comments?
13. The film and the Royal family, problems, public relations?
14. The film as illustrating the role of the media, journalists, producers, scoops and ratings, reputations?

ONE LIFE

UK, 2023, 110 minutes, Colour.

Anthony Hopkins, Johnny Flynn, Helena Bonham Carter, Jonathan Pryce, Lena Olin, Romola Garai, Adrian Rawlins, Marthe Keller, Alex Sharp, Ziggy Heath, Samantha Spiro.

Directed by James Hawes.

There is great symbolism in the name of this film, British Nicholas Winton, one life and what he achieved. There is also the symbolism of anyone saving one life and that being an achievement.

In 2000 there was a popular documentary, narrated by Judi Dench, Oscar-winner for Best Documentary, Into The Arms of Strangers: Stories of the Kindertransport,, documenting a significant rescue of Jewish children from Czechoslovakia in 1938-1939. The children had been stranded, ousted by the Nazis after the occupation of the Sudetenland, many of their parents destined for the camps. A group of British helpers and locals, with the connections of Nicholas Winton, a young banker from London, getting the approval of the rabbi and the authorities, organising British passports for the children, adopting families and a financial deposit, were able to save 669 children on train journeys from prior to London. With the invasion of Poland September 1939, many children ready to move, but the program halted.

There were several other documentaries on Nicholas Winton and the children, especially the trilogy of films All My Loved Ones (1999), Nicholas Winton - The Power of Good (2002), Nicky's Family (2011) by Czechoslovakian (born in Bratislava, Slovakia), Matej Minak.

Here is a drama, rather than a documentary, based on the characters and events. And, as might be expected, the film is a very moving experience.

The framework of the screenplay is the 1980s, the older Nicholas Winton, retired, at home with his wife, expecting a grandchild, clearing the house and destroying some old documents, but finding a significant scrapbook of 1938-1939, photos of the children, newspaper articles, and Winton wanting it to find a significant home. In this he was aided by several authorities but especially by Robert Maxwell’s wife, articles, television programs.

And, of course, the strength of the film is in Anthony Hopkins’ screen presence and performance, Hopkins performing this role in his mid-80s. Veteran Swedish actress, Lena Olin, plays his wife.

Throughout the film there are strong flashbacks to what actually happened in Prague, versatile actor Johnny Flynn plays the younger Nicholas Winton, a concerned Britain, banker, friends in Prague, visiting, wanting to do something, the locals, including Romola Garai as Doreen and Alex Sharp as Trevor, are initially wary but all work together to identify the children, photograph them, list details, arrange with rather severe bureaucrats in London for passports, find adoptive parents, get financial deposits for the trip and the immediate settlement.

Nicholas Winton was helped by his German-born mother, very supportive and determined, especially in confronting authorities, a fine performance by a vigorous Helena Bonham Carter.

Audiences familiar with Nicholas Winton will have seen footage (available on YouTube) of the famous television program, reviewing Nicholas Winton’s life, where the compere asked anyone in the audience who had been helped by Winton to stand up. All those in the studio audience stood. A very moving moment at the time, and now in the film.

One Life is a reminder that there were so many in Europe who shielded and hid Jewish families, many who rescued them, and, as always, lest we forget.

1. The story of Nicholas Winton and the rescue of the children from Czechoslovakia? Audience knowledge of Nicholas Winton, the documentaries about him and the transport children?
2. A true story, the 1930s, the anticipation of World War II, anti-Semitism, Nazi expansion? The arrest of adult Jews, the children, stranded, their rescue by train? Adoption in England?
3. The initial focus on the older Nicholas Winton, as played by Anthony Hopkins, the 1980s, his age, his marriage, children, home, retirement? The insertion of the flashbacks to 1938, Johnny Flynn as the younger Nicholas Winton, his mission and its achievement? The screenplay moving backwards and forwards in time, anchored in Anthony Hopkins’ strong screen presence, and Johnny Flynn’s persuasive performance, determination, hesitation, achievement in the past?

4. 1938, Nicholas Winton, his strong-minded mother, German, coming to the UK with her husband, Jewish background? The changing of the name during World War I? A strong influence on her son? His role as a banker, conventionally British, of the time? Yet his concern, his friends in Czechoslovakia? His decision to go to Prague, the encounter with the group, the meeting with Doreen, her scepticism, Trevor, the local members, their concern, social action? The dangers? The imminent German invasion of the Sudetenland?

5. Nicholas, his determination, his organisational skills, money and finance, raising donations, contacts in England? Working with the group, the visits of the rabbi, the Rabbi and his scepticism? Persuaded? Nicholas and his meeting the people, especially the children, their conditions, squalid, poverty, the parents, the wary father and then his change, fearing that Nicholas was a German authority? The range of photos, the young girls, their age, the little boys? Later sequences of Winton looking at the photos, wistful, remembering, regretful?
6. The return to England, the character’s mother, her understanding, support, going to the officials, the issue of the passports, the hesitation of the bureaucrats? The personal appeal to the bureaucrat, his family, his agreement, supplying the passports?
7. The organising of the children, getting all the details, the lists, the files, coordinating the train trips, the passports, organising the adopting families in England, and the financial deposit? The energy of the film in the sequences in showing the urgency, Nicholas and his mother, and those working in Prague, Doreen and Trevor, the locals?
8. The scenes of the trains, the children, the farewells and grief, the hopes of the parents, arriving in England, the families, the allotments? Separation of families?
9. The news of the invasion of Poland, the stopping of the program, the last train, the guards on the train and their treatment of the children, looking down on the adults accompanying them?
10. The war, 669 children saved, the vast number unable to be transported?
11. The 1980s, Nicholas and his wife, her fussing, wanting the house cleared, his throwing out rubbish, files, but the folder and the scrapbook, memories of Trevor? His going to visit the authorities, decisions for the scrapbook in museums? His wanting something more active? The connection with Robert Maxwell, going to see Lady Maxwell, her interest, the news items, reporting?
12. The television program, Your Life, Nicholas vaguely watching it, his wife not liking the program? His being invited, the tracking down of some of the children and what happened to them in England? The program, his being in the front row, sitting next to one of the children, the reconciliation?
13. The re-creation of the famous television program, Nicholas and his wife present, other two children next to him, the praise of his life, and the invitation to anyone in the audience who had a connection with the rescue children to stand up, everybody in the audience rising? The emotion?
14. Prague, Doreen and Trevor, the information as to their surviving, subsequent work?
15. The title of the film, saving long life, contributing to saving many lives?