Displaying items by tag: Hugh Bonneville

PADDINGTON IN PERU

UK, 2024, 106 minutes, Colour.

Hugh Bonneville, Emily Mortimer, Samuel Joslin, Madaleine Harris, Julie Walters, Olivia Coleman, Jim Broadbent, Hayley Atwell, Voices of: Ben Whishaw, Imelda Staunton. Cameos by Hugh Grant, Joel Fry, Robbie Gee, Sanjeev Baskhar, Ben Miller, Jessica Hynes.

Directed by Dougal Wilson.

Who cannot like Paddington! His stories are always bearable!

We have enjoyed the first two films very much. There was an element of surprise about them, the introduction to Paddington himself, the wonderful voice provided by Ben Whishaw, the members of the Brown family and their ability to welcome Paddington. And, there were various adventures and, who can forget, the villainous Hugh Grant?

It does mean that here we accept Paddington straightaway, the glimpse of his early years in Peru reaching out to pick a beautiful orange, falling into the River – and landing in London. Now, a letter from his Aunt Lucy (voiced by Imelda Staunton) encouraging him to come for a visit (and that humour is awkward episode getting his passport photographs).

But there is a bit of background about Mr Brown, somewhat British stick-in-the Mode, challenged at work about risks. In the brainwave! Why don’t they all go with Paddington to Peru, including the kindly Mrs Bird (Julie Walters). Hugh Bonneville is once again Mr Brown but, this time, Emily Mortimer is Mrs Brown.

Once they will arrive in Peru, now met by Reverend Mother at the local home for retired bears! Suddenly, and exuberantly, we have Sister Act meets The Sound of Music. But, bad news, aunt Lucy has disappeared and Paddington is determined to find her. And, Olivia Coleman, in recent years showing a variety of talent (Wonka,  Little Wicked Letters), is here as the exuberant Reverend Mother.

With the action adventure that follows, more than a touch of Indiana Jones here, the action is geared more to the young audience, the touch of caricature with the boat captain (Antonio Banderas), farcical and slapstick situations high dangers and minutes, especially as Paddington and the family get lost in the Andes jungle, double dealings and some sinister flashbacks…

But, there are some secrets to be revealed, and a variation on the search for El Dorado and that fabled gold. This, everybody benefits from the adventure, and Mr Brown becomes extraordinarily daring. And Paddington has to make a decision, finding his tribe there in Peru, and whether he will go back home with the Browns.

Adult audiences, especially, please don’t rush for the exit when the credits begin to appear because there is a very enjoyable special guest interlude during the credits. And, as always, possibilities for more.

1. The popularity of Paddington, the films? And in himself, from Peru, landing in London, the Brown family, part of the family, his adventures, memories of Aunt Lucy in Peru, the possibility of his returning to visit Peru and Aunt Lucy? The effectiveness of Ben Wishaw’s voice?
2. Expectations from the previous film and their popularity and acclaim? The intentions of the filmmakers here, a film for younger audiences, style, treatment, humour, adventures, the touch of the absurd for enjoyment? The impact for older audiences, the adult characters, the adventure, the mayhem? And the postscript with Hugh Grant?
3. The scenes of Paddington’s origins, little bear, the oranges, on the branch, falling, to England, with the family? The memories of Aunt Lucy? The correspondence with her? His receiving the letter from her, inviting him to Peru, his eagerness?
4. The Brown family, the children growing older, University entrance, computer games and inventions, not wanting to play Scrabble with the mother, Mr Brown, the firm, Risk-taking, the American executive, her demands, the challenge to him? His very proper reticent British way of style of life?
5. The suggestion to go to Peru, the reaction of the family, Mr Brown and the decision to take a risk? Mrs Bird and her presence, decision to go? The farewell in the street with all the British film and television celebrities’ cameos? The flight, landing, Peru?
6. The visuals of Peru, the mountains, the river, waterfalls, locations in Peru and Colombia? The settlement? The boat
7. the convent, Reverend Mother, her cheery attitude, the staging of the musical, Sister Act meets The Sound of Music? The family settling in? The disappearance of Aunt Lucy, the nuns? The retired bears and their lifestyle, bingo…? Reverend Mother and her explanations, her eagerness for them to go searching, but her remaining at home?
8. The expedition, Paddington and his eagerness, the family, hiring the boat, the captain and his daughter, his manner and mannerisms? On the voyage, the comedy, the dangers, the rapids?
9. The background of El Dorado, the captain and his ancestors and their appearing behind him, his relationship with his daughter, the search for gold, Paddington and his arm band, the translation and interpretation? The captain disappearing and his search?
10. The family on the boat, the dangers, capsizing, stranded? Through the jungle? Mr Brown and his being more daring? Paddington’s memories of the Inca image, his arrival at the tower, the rock? The family arriving?
11. The Machu Picchu kind of location, the confrontation with the captain, pursuing more Paddington, the fights, the bolder, the dangers…? The reappearance of the daughter, her helping the family?
12. Mrs Bird, back at the convent, curious, suspicious, finding the radio room, the confrontation, the truth about Reverend Mother? The plane, flying, the crash landing, the confrontation, Reverend Mother from the El Dorado-seeking family, the flashbacks to their disasters? The confrontation with the captain? Her being overcome?
13. Finding Aunt Lucy, going beyond the barrier, finding El Dorado, the gold being the oranges, the scenes of collecting, squeezing, Paddington and his predilection for marmalade?
14. Paddington finding his tribe, his being welcomed, his speech, the family ready for him to stay, his decision to return with them, finding his tribe but going home with his family?
15. Happy ending – and the epilogue with Phoenix Buchanan and Hugh Grant’s style? Future prospects?

NEVER FORGET TIBET

UK, 2022, 94 minutes, Colour.

Narrated by Hugh Bonneville.

Directed by Jean-Paul Mertinez.

This is a very worthy project. It cannot be condemned by those who dislike straightforward narratives, chronicled from beginning to end. Rather, this documentary has a whole lot of themes, all mixed together, sometimes reappearing unexpectedly (and without immediate reason).

There are many reasons for watching the film. One of the main reasons is to go back to the Dalai Lama’s history, the complex relationship with the Chinese government in 1950 and then his escape from Lhasa in March 1958.

There is some initial background about the Dalai Lama himself, his being a reincarnation of previous Dalai Lamas, interviews with members of his family, especially with his younger brother, very articulate, remembering the past, the escape, his own life, studies, hippy days, serious days and study, as well as the Dalai Lama’s sister who reestablished the Buddhist nuns, fostering their training, academic education, contempt of life in exile in India.

The film introduces us to an Indian journalist, niece of the Indian official who guided and received the Dalai Lama and his entourage at the time of their escape. There is a sequence where he meets the Dalai Lama, embraces him, and they reminisce, as well as noting how each of them has got older. The journalist has been able to arrange time with the Dalai Lama.

Over the decades, the Dalai Lama has been an engaging personality, not always clear when speaking English, but always willing to do so, and there is his perennial humour and laugh. Here we have an opportunity to spend quite some time with the Dalai Lama, his comments about his experiences when young, his training, the episode with China in 1950, spending time in Beijing, interested in Marxism and Socialism, a relationship with Mao Tse Tung. However, he does spend quite a lot of time, giving quite some vivid detail of his memories of the escape, the timing, the dangers, the harsh Indian countryside and mountains, illness, the welcome when received.

There is also commentary by a younger Indian journalist focusing on the past but also highlighting aspect of Tibet in the present and the relationship with China.

And, scattered throughout the film are quite a number of episodes – an interview with a Buddhist leader and his explanation of meditation and chant; a meeting with the Dalai Lamas doctor; an interview with doctor who runs the medical centre today in Lhasa. And, throughout the film, there is an interview with an expert on the Austrian traveller, Heinrich Harrer, famous for his book (and the subsequent film with Brad Pitt) Seven Years in Tibet. His being in Tibet is explained, his time there, his understanding of the Buddhist culture, the role of the Dalai Lama. And, keeping records of his experiences in Tibet, also taking advantage, sometimes with very limited photographic equipment, of taking photos, preserving them through travels and difficulties, there are eventually being able to to be developed in 1951. The film incorporates many of these photos.

So, not the most polished of documentaries, but a great deal of interesting interviews, footage, photos, and the personality and the spiritual compassion and profound Buddhist messages as expressed by the Dalai Lama.

MUMMIES

Spain, 2023, 88 minutes, Colour.

Joe Thomas, Eleanor Tomlinson, Hugh Bonneville, Sean Bean, Celia Imre, Santiago Winder, Shakka, Dan Starkey.

Directed by Juan Jesus Garcia Galocho.

An unexpected and entertaining animation film, especially because it comes from Spain, Spanish writers, Spanish director, Spanish technology – but with the central part of the action taking place in contemporary London.

This is a film which young audiences may well enjoy with its characters, adventures. However, it is also a tongue-in-cheek entertainment for an adult audience, especially those with some familiarity of exploration and excavations, digging up ancient Egypt, transporting souvenirs for museums in Europe. And the popular music scene.

The original version has a Spanish voice cast but for English-speaking audiences there is an excellent cast, Joe Thomas and Eleanor Tomlinson in the central roles, Sean Bean as the Pharaoh, Hugh Bonneville is a sometimes dim-witted, ambitious and villainous Lord Carnaby. And, in support, is Celia Imre as the mother.

There is ambiguity in the title of the film. There are the Egyptian mummies but Lord Carnaby’s mother is continually phoning him, criticising him, demanding he go to the theatre, a torment in his life, and villainous mummy, so to speak.

The action opens with a Ben Hur kind of chariot race introducing us to the hero, Thurt, the charioteer, triumphant, but his wheels falling off his going into depression, wanting isolation, autographing fan cards. He has a chance encounter with the Princess, harsh in her manner, told by her father that she has to marry, and the sacred bird will indicate the correct suitor. The charioteer’s precocious younger brother throws a boomerang and it bounces off various surfaces finally hitting the charioteer. He wants to live alone. The Princess doesn’t want to marry, feels imposed on.

In the meantime, we see Lord Carnaby and his dimwitted associates excavating, finding treasure, especially a ring, which the charioteer and the Princess want to recover. And, here is the inventiveness, they have to leave the Egyptian Afterlife and go into the contemporary world, the audience looking at our world through their eyes and amazement, although the younger brother adapts very very quickly to the technology and to the slaying.

The main action then takes place in London, the charity and Princess thinking that such a big metropolis must be Rome. Their adventures take place in the theatre putting on a new musical of Aida with all its costume and Egyptian sets, the Princess seeing the ring and taking over the singing, great applause, being taken up by an enthusiastic rapper, Ed (Shakka). The Princess is applauded, makes a record, goes viral, loves the fame. But they are captured by Lord Carnaby and what follows is a struggle in the Museum, a car and bus chase through London, and a final return to the Afterlife, a couple in love, happy ever after.

An unexpectedly enjoyable experience.

1. A film for children? A film for adults?
2. The title, the Egyptian mummies? And Lord Carnaby’s continual phone calls and criticisms from his mother?
3. The Spanish film, Spanish writers and director, the British version with British voice cast? Musical score? Songs? A musical of Aida?
4. The imagination of the film, ancient Egypt, the Egyptian afterlife, 21^st-century excavations, discoveries, artefacts, exhibitions? The characters from the afterlife in the 21^st-century, Egypt, London? Spotlights and their appearing as skeletal?
5. Introduction to Thurt, the amphitheatre, the chariot race, echoes of Ben Hur, victory, the chariot wheels, his retiring, loss of self-confidence, yet being a star, autographing all the cards? With his young brother, with the dog? The sudden discovery that he was to be married to the Princess?
6. The Princess, the clash with the charioteer in the street, her haughtiness, the pharaoh, her chaperone, to be married, her wanting independence, the announcement of the charioteer, the bird and its choice (and the little brother’s boomerang)? The issue of the ring?
7. Lord Carnaby, the satire on British excavators? His two dithering assistants? The excavations, the discoveries, the ring, his ambitions, transferring everything to London, his museum? The setting up of the exhibition? His relationship with his mother, her continually dominating, phoning at the wrong time, demanding he go to the theatre, the theatre performance? Her phoning him even when in the same room?
8. The adventures of the charioteer, the Princess, the little brother and the dog, venturing out into the modern world, amazed, the audience looking at 21^st-century through their eyes? The transport, going to London, thinking that it was Rome? The younger brother adapting to the 21^st-century, all the technology, all the slaying? The dog enjoying himself?
9. The tension between the charioteer and Princess, not wanting to be married, he to be a bachelor, she to be free, her ambitions? The sparring, their being forced together? The traffic and the dangers? Going to the theatre, the new musical of Aida, the sets and costumes, the stage manager pushing the men, on stage, the performance, the Princess intervening, taking over, the ring, her song, glimpsed as skeletal yet the applause?
10. The encounter with, rapper, entrepreneur, praising the Princess, saving them, giving them accommodation, the charioteer and his jealousy? Going to the shops, the credit card, the display of different costumes? Going to the studio, the Princess performing its song? Its success, going viral? Her being pleased, acknowledged, applauded?
11. Going to the museum, their being trapped by Lord Carnaby, drugged, the brother and dog to the rescue, Ed intervening, his being drugged, all the action, yet the two assistants and their dithering, at the drinks and sweets machine, the cardboard cutout of Lord Carnaby, the bewilderment, the escape, the drive through London, the brother driving the bus, the dog with the pedal, Lord Carnaby in pursuit, the manoeuvres, his finishing up on the barge on the Thames?
12. The Princess, her decision, the return to Egypt’s, the pharaoh and his welcome, her mother, the charioteer and his proposal? Happy ending – and her singing?
13. An inventive imaginative animation entertainment?