Displaying items by tag: Bill Nighy

JOY

UK, 2024, 115 minutes, Colour.

Thomasin McKenzie, James Norton, Bill Nighy, Rish Shah, Tanya Moodie, Joanna Scanlon.

Directed by Ben Taylor.

The 21^st century audience takes IVF procedures for granted. It was not always the case as this film dramatises.

This is an interesting and enjoyable drama, fairly straightforward in its presentation. It opens in 1968, the year in which the central characters started to work together towards success in IVF procedures, the naming of particular years on the screen, until 1977 and success with the pregnancy and in 1978, the birth of the first baby, Louise Brown, in England.

The is one follows the science steps of those involved, insights, experiments, many failures, and some scepticism from the science community. The film also follows the scientists and surgery working with a range of infertile women, full of hope that they will be able to conceive and give birth. And, the screenplay gives a great deal of attention to ethical issues, criticisms, the accusation of interfering with nature, fears of the consequences in health for the children born.

At the opening of the film, there is a tribute to the three people key to the development of IVF and the comment that one of them, a young woman at the time, a trained nurse with an interest in science, Jean Purdy, who had died at age 39 from cancer, had not been included in the plaques or tributes. And the surgeon who was key to the processes, Patrick Steptoe, had also died. The survivor, named as a Nobel prizewinner Robert Edwards, is honoured but makes an appeal for recognition of the other two.

With this introduction, we see the young Jean Purdy (New Zealand actress, Thomasin McKenzie) eager to meet the creative scientist, Bob Edwards (James Norton), successful in catching a runaway mouse in the lab, immediately getting a job. They go to hear the surgeon, Patrick Steptoe, played by Bill Nighy in one of his most agreeably positive roles, in dispute with other scientists, noting some of his surgical breakthroughs.

The action taking place over a decade, we see the young woman moving from her 20s to 30s, deeply involved, her religious mother disagreeing with her, not wanting her to visit her or the church, a sacrifice for the religiously-minded Jean. The quality Jean brings to the procedure is the personal interaction with the women, not just the science and the medicine, but the personal, emotional, the psychological – the first group of women calling themselves the Ovum Club.

James Norton is intense as Edwards, a family man with several daughters, aggressive, especially in a range of television interviews where he is challenged, his procedures are denounced, his becoming despondent, deciding to stand for politics but not being elected, persuaded by Jean to go back to the enterprise.

Patrick Steptoe offers the medical contribution, the precise and typical procedures for the impregnation, number of attempts, having to communicate failure to the hopeful would-be mothers, supported by his wife over the years.

The last part of the film is the encounter with the Browns, the success, the pregnancy, the caesarean birth, the joy of the parents, the happiness of the trio – and the Browns offering them to suggest the middle name for their daughter, the group suggesting Joy.

1. Audience knowledge of the development of IVF, the 1960s and 1970s, science, ethics, media, religion, public opinion?
2. The title, the joy of women giving birth, the team’s name for the middle name for Louise Brown?
3. Based on a true story, the opening speech, Robert Edwards and his point that Jean Purdy had been ignored, his plea for acknowledgement for her? For Patrick Steptoe? The visualising of the plaque at the hospital?
4. Introduction to Robert Edwards, his scientific background, the beginnings of IVF, his laboratory work, his team, his interest in Patrick Steptoe, at the lecture, Steptoe and his interrupting the speaker, his irritation? Indications of clashes between scientists and their subjects, possibilities, ethical issues?
5. Jean, her age, her background work as a nurse, science, her interest in Bob Edwards, coming to the office, wet shoes, holes, the chasing of the mouse, catching it, being hired?
6. Jean, her personality, religious, church, the Vicar? Her mother, devout? Her mother correcting her, not stooping…? The mother’s response to her daughter’s work, public opinion, wanting her to give it up, not going to the church, not coming to the home, the pain for Jean, the loss of religious comfort in the church, the separation from her mother, the later visit to the church, with the vicar? The hostile helper? Leaving the treat for her mother at the door?
7. Bob Edwards, his intensity, at home, his wife, his daughters, home life? The discussions? His continued investigations, persuading Patrick Steptoe, Steptoe and his techniques, laparoscopy, assisted by Marian, Matron, Jean’s shock to discover he was doing abortions? Matron’s explanation of backyard abortions, women’s choice?
8. The highlighting of dates, from 1968, various moves to 1977, the stages of experiments, the scientific explanations given, the close-ups of the work, confidence, the group of women, arriving, talking, tests, the procedures,, disappointments, audience sympathy for the women? The calling themselves the Oval Club? Jean and her personal listening, the outing to the beach?
9. The effect of all this work over the years on Jean? Her looking sad, often morose? The interactions with Patrick, especially concerning her illness and the possibility of having children? The interactions with Bob, the enthusiasms, the disappointments, fresh ideas and possibilities?
10. Her leaving, going back to her mother, caring for her mother, her mother’s death? The funeral, Patrick and his wife coming?
11. The continued interest, ideas, the contact with Bob, his standing for the Labor Party, his defeat? The group getting together again?
12. The new group of women? Moving to 1977?
13. Bob, direct, the media, trying to avoid journalists, television interviews, the discussion with the scientist and his development of DNA? The public hostility in the television audience? Scientists and their condemnations? Ethical issues? His arguments in the developments in contact lenses, false teeth…? And the risks of failure?
14. The buildup to the first success, Leslie Brown and her husband, an ordinary couple, their consent, the details of the IVF work, her pregnancy, the caesarean birth, the first IVF baby, her father, the joy of the team, the process being filmed, the photos? The decision to offer the name Joy for the baby?
15. The importance for audiences to see this story, the human issues in the context for scientific development, ethical issues, decisions? The final information about the statistics of babies born through IVF?

THE WILD ROBOT

US, 2024, 101 minutes, Colour.

Voices of: Lupita Nyong’o, Pedro Pascal, Kit Connor, Bill Nighy, Stephanie Hsu, Matt Berry, Ving Rhames, Mark Hamill, Catherine O'Hara.

Directed by Chris Sanders.

Fans of Peter Brown’s 2016 illustrated novel, The Wild Robot, will be delighted to see this film version. In fact, delight has been the response of audiences – and also of many critics.

We are definitely in the 21^st-century with an animated family film focusing on a robot – although, Peter Brown in his detailed blog on the Internet about his writing his book over a period of eight years, has many interesting observations about origins of writing about robots as far back as the 1920s. But, to have a children’s film focusing on a robot, very much of our times. (And these years there are many films for adults with dramatic stories about androids and humans being served and protected by them as well as stories of betrayals.)

In trying to describe the perspectives of The Wild Robot, it could be said on the one hand that the picture of nature, animals in the forests, their personalities, is in the Disney tradition, especially of Bambi. And, on the other hand, the picture of robots, technology, artificial intelligence, is very much a contemporary perspective.

And, a robot in the wild, a robot whose name comes from her code initials, abbreviated to Roz, and the machine a female voice by Lupita Nyong’o. A shipwreck, Roz stranded, re-booted, the strong sense of mission (and her repeating her promotion instructions aloud). Needless to say, the wide range of animals, all enjoyably portrayed, do not respond well, fearful.

But, that is just the beginning. Two engaging characters emerge, a little Gosling bereft of family who gets the nickname Brightbird (Kit Connor) and an engaging fox, Fink (Pedro Pascal enjoying himself) whom nobody likes but who becomes a great favourite with the audience.

In fact, there is plenty of plot, Roz teaching the Gosling how to lie while looked down on by the rest of the geese; the bird migration led by the wise Longneck (Bill Nigh); some misunderstandings, some reconciliations, and Roz finally affirmed by the animals as she is able to help them in a very cold hibernation.

And, there is more with the robots, contact with the company, some ruthless executives, wanting to control Roz. While robots have no emotions, Roz learns more and more from her animal friends, standing up for herself and for them.

The film has been written and directed by Chris Sanders, best known for The Crudes series and, especially, charming action story, How to Train Your Dragon. Here he has been able to appeal to younger audiences with a great deal to interest and entertain an adult audience.

1. Family-friendly animation, style, story, characters? Musical score?
2. 21^st-century, robots, artificial intelligence, techno developments? And memories of past animation, animals, the forests? The combination?
3. The situation, the future, robots, the storm, the destruction, Roz stranded, programmed, promoting her services? The female voice? The encounter with the bear, the crushing of the geese, the survival of the Gosling, befriending it, training it, calling it Brightbill? The Fox, Fink, on the outer, yet bonding, helping with Brightbill? The possum, guides of how to mother they Gosling? But fear from the other geese?
4. The range of animals in the forest, memories of Disney animals and Bambi? The fear of Roz? The importance of Brockville learning to fly, to swim, the training, eventual success?
5. Brightbill, personality, growing, succeeding, information about Roz and the loss of his family? Hostility? The preparation for the migration, the role of Longneck? Brightbill and his agitation? The geese flying, the storm, taking refuge in the robot headquarters, the clashes and persecution, Brightbill not afraid, leading them to safety? Longneck sacrificing himself?
6. The hibernation, the animals going into hibernation, Roz helping, their bonding with Roz? The squabbling, fights, traditions, Fink and his mediating? The episode with the bear?
7. Roz, trying to reactivate, the links with the headquarters, the response at headquarters, the head, sending robots, locating Roz, the attack on the animals, the fight back, the fire?
8. The geese returning, Brightbill, reconciliation with Roz?
9. Roz, agreeing to leave, going back to the headquarters, working in the greenhouse, Brightbill and his visit, but her still having her emotional responses?
10. The family friendly story about technology, operation by exploiters, but possibilities for harmony and peace?

THE BEAUTIFUL GAME

UK, 2024, 125 minutes, Colour.

Bil Nighy, Micheal Ward, Valeria Golino,, Kit Young, Callum Scott Howells, Tom Vaughan Lawler, Leo Hamilton, Susan Warlomo, Christina Rodio.

Directed by Thea Sharrock.

Even though this is a soccer (football, a.k.a. in the UK, The Beautiful Game), it is much more than just a sports film – although fans will enjoy the different matches and the play.

But there is much, much more to the film then the soccer, essential though it is.

Did we know that since 2001 there has been the Homeless World Cup, where teams of homeless men and women representing their country train, have a coach, can apply to participate in the annual competition, a small group going to the host country, small sides, limited playing time, but a competition nonetheless?

Here the competition venue is Rome (always an attractive location). The focus is on a UK group, a group of men, though the American side is a team of women, coached by Mal, a thoughtful Bill Nighy, Nighy at his most likeable.. We learn the homeless stories, addiction, gambling, child neglect… But these men are on the moral mend, especially through the team.

The film has opened with children playing football, a young man watching them, joining in the kicking, but the audience suspecting that he has a chip on his shoulder. He is a bitter former professional, Vinnie (Micheal Ward), with emotional consequences. Mel watches him, invites him to join the group which he reluctantly does. He shows he has great skills, especially with his feet on the ball. However, his relationship with the rest of the men has very strong ups and downs.

Then, the team is ready, and off to Rome. Audiences who enjoy Rome will find plenty to their liking. (The screenplay has been written by Frank Cottrell Boyce (Dog Millionaire), a Catholic, often including Catholic themes in his films, like Millions about being a saint. He introduces some God talk, especially through one of the most exuberant characters in the film, a South African nun, the coach and sponsor of their team, delayed at passport control in South Africa because of visa problems for one of their members from Zimbabwe, but her persuading the official to let them arrive, arriving late, arranging a match with the English team, wearing her habit and veil, and gleefully calling on God for help!

The main teams we see are Japan, US, Italy and, as noted, South Africa. The matches have their excitement, the audience taking sides, especially when we realise that one of the English team is Syrian, a refugee barber, and the Italians have a hostile Syrian on their side. There is drama with the American team, a young woman determined to become a professional, the matches, some defeat, but a final reward for her.

In the meantime, Vinnie goes off by himself at times, refuses to share a room with one of his team who admires him, a former addict who lapses.

This is a very likeable film, and Mal is a very good man. There are some complications for Vinnie, his coping with his past, having to step up to some self-sacrifice – and finally, happily, learning why Mal has supported him so much.

A film of compassion blended with sports enthusiasm, an invitation to feel with others, hope for opportunities and second chances.

1. The title, football, soccer, UK name, beautiful?
2. The football audience, soccer audience, the other football codes? A sports Mfilm? More?
3. The Homeless World Cup? Since 2001? Its scope? The teams, limits, the times for the matches? International? The players coming only one time in their lives? International perspective?
4. The film and its outreach to the homeless, the reasons, addiction, neglecting children, gambling, thief? And the refugee barber from Syria?
5. The International preparations, the focus on the UK, the team from Japan and the girl in charge, her age? The men, vagrants, the look? South Africa, the nun, boisterous leadership, the team? The US, Rosita and her ambitions?
6. Gabriella, coordinator, knowing everyone, observations, comments, encouragement?
7. Vinny, the introduction, with the children, playing, intervening, the criticisms? Mal Bradley observing him, intervening, praising him? Vinny, the loner, in his car, the courier jobs, not available, visit, child, wife, clashes? Is History of playing professionally? His bitterness? The challenge?
8. Mal Bradley, his character, his years as a scout, his years with the Homeless team, bonding with each of them, encouraging, training them? The personal interactions with each?
9. Vinny bitter, scoring goals, special technique, Cal and his skills, reactions, training together?
10. The team, Nathan, simple and kind, revelation of his addiction, not able to be at home, the concern of his mother, the phone calls? Friendly with Vinny? Vinny not wanting to share the room with him, condemnation of Nathan as an addict, a loser? The effect on Nathan, the methadone treatment, neglecting it, having to go home, his apology to Vinny?
11. Kevin, the background of his gambling? Jason, naivete, the attraction towards Rosita and their encounters? Cal, skills, the story of neglecting his son in the car? Aldar, the war in Syria, Kurds, refugee, barber? And his giving the haircuts to the team?
12. The troubles, the spirit, the variety of teams? The South African team, held up with passport control, the introduction of sister, personality, the habit, boisterous, leading the team, prayer, God language? Insisting at the passport desk? The achievement, arriving in Rome, late for the match? Approaching Vinny, the agreement to the game? South Africa winning? The previous points for the UK because of their absence? The American team and their play?
13. The visualising of the matches, the techniques, tactics, the scores?
14. The spirit of the games, teamwork, opportunities, Rosita, her scholarship? The Italian team, the Syrian refugee, the final kicks, handshaking with Aldar? The Japanese loss, but the tour of Rome and their seeing beautiful things? Wanting one goal, getting more? The UK team and the visit to the Trevi fountain and tossing the coin, Mal and the memories of his wife and honeymoon?
15. Vinny and the clashes, not sharing the room, by himself, the request to play for South Africa, his achievement, the medals? Alienation from the team?
16. The ending, his arriving late, the reconciliation?
17. Mal telling them to the truth about scouting him, and his reaction, happy to have been scouted by Mal?
18. And the range of happy endings – touching the heart?

THE FIRST OMEN

US, 2024, 121 minutes, Colour.

Nell Tiger Free, Bill Nighy, Sonia Braga, Ralph Inesont, Maria Caballero, Nicole Soracce, Charles Dance.

Directed by Arkasha Stevenson.

It is almost 50 years since the quite high-profile original, The Omen, starring Gregory Peck and Lee Remick, showed an American ambassador and his wife adopting a charming child – who turned out to be Damien, the devil incarnate. Two sequels, Damien growing up, then Damien played by Sam Nell, wreaking evil in the world. There was a fourth film in 1991 and a remake in 2006. Almost 50 years of an Omen franchise.

Now, a prequel.

This time we are in 1971, early indications that the 60s changed young people, greater freedoms, and greater moving away from the churches. But, an eager young woman, Margaret (Neil Tiger Free), arriving in Rome from the United States, is to make her vows and work in an orphanage for girls, children of unmarried mothers,, invited by Cardinal Lawrence (Bill Nighy) who has known her since childhood.

There is a prologue with an ominous meeting between two priests, Charles dance and Ralph Tennyson, indicating that something terrible is happening, one priest afraid, in the confessional, but killed by the shattering of a falling glass stained window.

For audiences who saw Immaculate a month or so before the release of The First Omen, this will seem very familiar. And, as the film progresses, we see that the plotline has many more strong resemblances. (And commentators ‘divided, many pro-Immaculate, many Pro-First Omen, this reviewer inclining towards Immaculate.)

Needless to say, there are sinister (ominous!) things going on in the orphanage, a harridan of an abbess (Sonia Braga) are many strange nuns in very old-fashioned habits, young worldly woman who would not be allowed to remain in formation, out on the town, and an elaborate sequence, bridal gown and everything, often making her vows to the Cardinal, the orphans very nice and playful but one, Carlita, strange, segregated to tantrums in the “Bad capitalism”,, strange drawings, but Carlita bonds with Margaret.

Since the original films were about the incarnation of the devil, then we are expecting this kind of demonic sinister development. One of the variations on the theme is that there is a church cabal claiming orthodoxy, but who are despairing with defections from the church all over the world and who come up with the idea that if the devil became incarnate, this would so terrify people that they would want to return and take refuge with the church! A novel theological-pastoral approach which, someone in the film describes as “insane”. Yes.

However, once this premise is established, it is full steam ahead, sinister scientific machinations behind the scenes (those in Immaculate were even more imaginative), pregnancies, horrifying birth sequences, and the seeming victory of the fanatics.

A satisfying moment towards the end when the nuns arrange for the child to be adopted and a photo of Gregory Peck from the original film comes up.

But, not quite, a final sequence which sets the scene for a sequel to the prequel.

1. The status of the Franchise? The original in 1976? Two sequels? A different beginning with Omen IV? The remake of the original in 2006? A prequel?
2. The similarity of the story and issues with Immaculate, 2004? Released at much the same time?
3. Audience expectations, memories of the original film? Satan, the demonic, demonic incarnation? The power of the demonic child? The motivation here that people were leaving the church, that the appearance of a Demon child would frighten back adherence to the church?
4. 1971, the changes in the world, with youth, freedoms, adherence to the church during the 1960s? The hypothesis of an alternate church, focused on the devil, using young women, preparing them to be mothers of the demonic, the motivation to put fear into the population? The insanity of the hypothesis?
5. The opening, the stained-glass in the church, Father Brennan, the confessional, Father Harris? Coming outside, it is to Harris and the warnings, the stained-glass, the gash on his head, his death? Father Brennan, then excommunication?
6. The introduction to Margaret, story of her being an orphan, the patronage of Cardinal Lawrence, coming from Massachusetts, to make her vows in the community, the commitment? Arrival in Rome, Father Gabriel, her own chauffeur, the welcome from the Cardinal? The initial encounter with the abyss, her manner? Her room, the encounter with Luz, free and easy and her manner?
7. The orphanage, the children, unmarried mothers, the little girls, classes, play, Margaret bonding with them, her Italian and English, the story of the butterfly and wishing to fly? Suspicions? Noticing the priest and the nuns? The encounter with Carlita? Carlita, alone, the “Bad Room”? Her drawings, the gift, happy drawings, the black nuns, the later pregnancy drawing? The explanations, her birth in the orphanage, the documents, her seclusion?
8. Cardinal Lawrence, genial, welcoming, memories of the past, his influencing the orphanage, working with the abbess? His visits? The ceremony for Luz, the bridal dress, the change into the habit, the restrictions, the nuns prostrate and chanting, her vows?
9. Luz, provocative, the dress for Margaret, urging her to go out, taunting her about her narrow outlook, the nightclub, drinking, the encounter with the men, the meeting with Paolo, talking, the dancing, her drinking too much, the collapse, being brought home, the explanations by Luz? And the later encounter with Paolo in the street, in her habit, his fleeing from her, the crash, being pinned against the wall, her holding him, severed, his death? His fears?
10. Margaret at work, seemingly normal, the range of nuns, the smoking gun, the chatter, the meals, the children and their enjoyment? Carlita, separated, confiding in Margaret?
11. Margaret, the glass, the woman giving birth, the Demon claws emerging?
12. Father Brennan, approaching Margaret, the address, the going to visit, his explanations, the demonic, Margaret leaving? His argument about the documentation? The ceremony, Margaret leaving, the search in the office, finding the documentation?
13. Father Gabriel, friendship, her talking with him, the pursuit, his saving her, the going to Father Brennan,, his picture of the baby, with Carlita’s name, going through the documents, placing the photograph, between? And the 666? In Carlita’s mouth? The sign on the head, the search of Margaret’s head, her being the destined mother of the child? Preserved, being brought to Rome?
14. The capture, Margaret being chained, the pregnancy, the nuns, the cardinal, everybody in attendance, the black veils, the alternate Church? The difficulties of the birth, the incisions? The womb, the emergence of the child, twins, a boy, the group happy? Taking the child, consecrating it? The abbess?
15. Margaret, the knives, turning the tables, the death of the cardinal, the girl child, the fire, the assumption that she and the child were burned?
16. Margaret and the child, surviving, the girl? The visit of father Brennan, his warnings?
17. The setting up of a sequel for this prequel?